Mild behavioral impairment in people with mild cognitive impairment: Are the two conditions related?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Julia-Sophia Scheuermann, Elmar Graessel, André Kratzer, Petra Scheerbaum
{"title":"Mild behavioral impairment in people with mild cognitive impairment: Are the two conditions related?","authors":"Julia-Sophia Scheuermann, Elmar Graessel, André Kratzer, Petra Scheerbaum","doi":"10.1177/13872877241291231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild behavioral impairment (MBI) are both considered potential prodromal stages of dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease. Previous literature has lacked specific information about MBI in individuals with MCI and associations of several aspects of both, MBI and MCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to investigate whether associations exist between aspects of MBI and aspects of cognitive performance in certain dimensions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from the double-blind randomized controlled intervention MCI-CCT-study. Current cognitive performance of individuals with MCI was measured with the MoCA. MBI was assessed with the MBI Shortscale (MBI short), which was administered through a self-report interview. Associations were assessed with Pearson correlations. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for gender and cognition. Group differences were examined with independent samples <i>t-tests</i> or Welch test. Significant correlations were considered in binary logistic regressions under control of covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant correlation between the current MoCA and MBI short scores in the total sample or in the gender-related analysis. Using dichotomized cognitive performance, significant correlations between MCI and MBI were revealed for individuals with lower MoCA scores. On the task level, several significant associations were identified between MoCA dimensions and MBI dimensions in the total sample and in the sensitivity analyses, also under control of covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the hypothesis that with increasing cognitive decline, the association between MCI and MBI becomes stronger. Furthermore, a certain cut-off on the MoCA must be reached to identify a correlation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241291231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild behavioral impairment (MBI) are both considered potential prodromal stages of dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease. Previous literature has lacked specific information about MBI in individuals with MCI and associations of several aspects of both, MBI and MCI.

Objective: Our aim was to investigate whether associations exist between aspects of MBI and aspects of cognitive performance in certain dimensions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Methods: We used baseline data from the double-blind randomized controlled intervention MCI-CCT-study. Current cognitive performance of individuals with MCI was measured with the MoCA. MBI was assessed with the MBI Shortscale (MBI short), which was administered through a self-report interview. Associations were assessed with Pearson correlations. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for gender and cognition. Group differences were examined with independent samples t-tests or Welch test. Significant correlations were considered in binary logistic regressions under control of covariates.

Results: There was no significant correlation between the current MoCA and MBI short scores in the total sample or in the gender-related analysis. Using dichotomized cognitive performance, significant correlations between MCI and MBI were revealed for individuals with lower MoCA scores. On the task level, several significant associations were identified between MoCA dimensions and MBI dimensions in the total sample and in the sensitivity analyses, also under control of covariates.

Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that with increasing cognitive decline, the association between MCI and MBI becomes stronger. Furthermore, a certain cut-off on the MoCA must be reached to identify a correlation.

轻度认知障碍患者的轻度行为障碍:这两种情况有关联吗?
背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度行为障碍(MBI)都被认为是痴呆症(尤其是阿尔茨海默病)的潜在前驱阶段。以往的文献缺乏有关轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者轻度行为障碍(MBI)的具体信息,也缺乏轻度行为障碍(MBI)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)之间几方面联系的具体信息:我们的目的是研究 MBI 的各个方面与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)某些方面的认知表现之间是否存在关联:我们使用了双盲随机对照干预 MCI-CCT 研究的基线数据。我们使用双盲随机对照干预MCI-CCT研究的基线数据,用MoCA测量了MCI患者当前的认知能力。MBI采用MBI短量表(MBI short)进行评估,该量表通过自我报告访谈的方式进行管理。相关性通过皮尔逊相关性进行评估。对性别和认知能力进行了敏感性分析。组间差异采用独立样本 t 检验或韦尔奇检验。在控制协变量的情况下,二元逻辑回归考虑了显著的相关性:结果:无论是在总样本中还是在与性别相关的分析中,当前的 MoCA 和 MBI 短分数之间都没有明显的相关性。通过对认知表现进行二分法分析发现,MoCA得分较低的个体与MCI和MBI之间存在显著相关性。在任务层面上,在总样本和敏感性分析中,MoCA维度与MBI维度之间发现了几种显著的相关性,这也是在控制协变量的情况下发现的:我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即随着认知能力下降的加剧,MCI 和 MBI 之间的关联会变得更强。此外,MoCA必须达到一定的临界值才能确定相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信