Multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panels for the evaluation of diarrhea in patients with acute leukemia.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Clyde D Ford, Bert K Lopansri, Bradley D Hunter, Jacob Wilkes, Julie Asch, Daanish Hoda
{"title":"Multiplexed gastrointestinal PCR panels for the evaluation of diarrhea in patients with acute leukemia.","authors":"Clyde D Ford, Bert K Lopansri, Bradley D Hunter, Jacob Wilkes, Julie Asch, Daanish Hoda","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better delineate multiplexed gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel (MGPP) diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship for patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia including indications and benefits of testing, optimal timing, and interpretation of results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrieved all MGPP ordered on 662 consecutive patients admitted with newly diagnosed acute leukemia between June 2015 and May 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional referral center for acute leukemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one (17%) of 305 MGPP obtained on the 198 patients who underwent testing identified at least one and 4 (1%) more than one diarrheagenic pathogen. The probability of a positive result was greater if obtained as an outpatient [20/52(38%)], but was not related to type of leukemia, sex, or age. Among the positive results, the pathogens identified included <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (78% of tests), norovirus (16%), diarrheagenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> (6%), adenovirus 40/41 (4%), and <i>Giardia lamblia</i> (4%). The results of 30 of the 305 tests resulted in a change in treatment (28 <i>C. difficile</i>, 2 <i>G. lamblia</i>). For the MGPP <i>C. difficile</i> results with an accompanying toxin determination, this included treatment following 16/19 tests with a positive toxin result and 11/19 with a negative. Actionable results other than <i>C. difficile</i> were rarely seen in the inpatient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MGPP testing is most useful when administered as an outpatient and of little benefit for inpatients with hospital-onset diarrhea. Since MGPP is sensitive and does not distinguish between colonization and causes of diarrhea, caution is needed in interpretation of results, especially for toxin-negative <i>C. difficile</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To better delineate multiplexed gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel (MGPP) diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship for patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia including indications and benefits of testing, optimal timing, and interpretation of results.

Study design: We retrieved all MGPP ordered on 662 consecutive patients admitted with newly diagnosed acute leukemia between June 2015 and May 2024.

Setting: Regional referral center for acute leukemia.

Results: Fifty-one (17%) of 305 MGPP obtained on the 198 patients who underwent testing identified at least one and 4 (1%) more than one diarrheagenic pathogen. The probability of a positive result was greater if obtained as an outpatient [20/52(38%)], but was not related to type of leukemia, sex, or age. Among the positive results, the pathogens identified included Clostridioides difficile (78% of tests), norovirus (16%), diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (6%), adenovirus 40/41 (4%), and Giardia lamblia (4%). The results of 30 of the 305 tests resulted in a change in treatment (28 C. difficile, 2 G. lamblia). For the MGPP C. difficile results with an accompanying toxin determination, this included treatment following 16/19 tests with a positive toxin result and 11/19 with a negative. Actionable results other than C. difficile were rarely seen in the inpatient population.

Conclusions: MGPP testing is most useful when administered as an outpatient and of little benefit for inpatients with hospital-onset diarrhea. Since MGPP is sensitive and does not distinguish between colonization and causes of diarrhea, caution is needed in interpretation of results, especially for toxin-negative C. difficile.

用于评估急性白血病患者腹泻的多重胃肠道 PCR 图谱。
目标:研究设计:我们检索了2015年6月至2024年5月期间连续收治的662名新确诊急性白血病患者的所有MGPP订单:研究设计:我们检索了 2015 年 6 月至 2024 年 5 月间新确诊急性白血病的 662 名连续入院患者的所有 MGPP 订单:地区急性白血病转诊中心:在接受检测的 198 名患者的 305 份 MGPP 中,有 51 份(17%)发现了至少一种腹泻病原体,4 份(1%)发现了一种以上的腹泻病原体。如果是门诊患者,阳性结果的概率更高[20/52(38%)],但与白血病类型、性别或年龄无关。在阳性结果中,确定的病原体包括艰难梭菌(78%)、诺如病毒(16%)、致泻性大肠杆菌(6%)、腺病毒 40/41(4%)和贾第鞭毛虫(4%)。在 305 项检测中,有 30 项检测的结果导致治疗方法的改变(艰难梭菌 28 项,蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫 2 项)。在 MGPP 艰难梭菌检测结果中,毒素检测结果呈阳性的有 16/19 例,呈阴性的有 11/19 例。除艰难梭菌外,住院病人中很少出现其他可采取行动的结果:结论:MGPP 检测在门诊患者中最有用,对住院腹泻患者的益处不大。由于 MGPP 比较敏感,而且不能区分定植和腹泻的原因,因此在解释结果时需要谨慎,尤其是对毒素阴性的艰难梭菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信