Association Between the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and in-Stent Neoatherosclerosis and Plaque Vulnerability: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ning Gu, Panke Chen, Xi Wang, Changyin Shen, Yi Deng, Jianling Chen, Yi Ma, Shuai Ma, Xingwei Hu, Ranzun Zhao, Bei Shi
{"title":"Association Between the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and in-Stent Neoatherosclerosis and Plaque Vulnerability: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.","authors":"Ning Gu, Panke Chen, Xi Wang, Changyin Shen, Yi Deng, Jianling Chen, Yi Ma, Shuai Ma, Xingwei Hu, Ranzun Zhao, Bei Shi","doi":"10.1097/FJC.0000000000001616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between in-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We divided 216 patients into 3 groups based on the NLR tertile. We performed a comparative analysis of baseline, angiographic, and features of optical coherence tomography (OCT) between the NLR groups and performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association of the NLR with ISNA and in-stent thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). Patients in the third tertile NLR group had a higher incidence of ISNA and in-stent TCFA compared with those in the first tertile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for ISNA and TCFA were 2.673 (1.257-5.684; P = 0.038) and 4.272 (1.740-10.488; P = 0.004), respectively, for patients in the highest tertile compared with those in the lowest tertile. Our study showed that an increased NLR was associated with ISNA and in-stent plaque fragility in patients with ISR following DES implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","volume":"84 5","pages":"506-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between in-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We divided 216 patients into 3 groups based on the NLR tertile. We performed a comparative analysis of baseline, angiographic, and features of optical coherence tomography (OCT) between the NLR groups and performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association of the NLR with ISNA and in-stent thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). Patients in the third tertile NLR group had a higher incidence of ISNA and in-stent TCFA compared with those in the first tertile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for ISNA and TCFA were 2.673 (1.257-5.684; P = 0.038) and 4.272 (1.740-10.488; P = 0.004), respectively, for patients in the highest tertile compared with those in the lowest tertile. Our study showed that an increased NLR was associated with ISNA and in-stent plaque fragility in patients with ISR following DES implantation.

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率与支架内新动脉粥样硬化和斑块易损性之间的关系:光学相干断层扫描研究。
摘要:本研究旨在探讨药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者的支架内新动脉粥样硬化(ISNA)与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)之间的关系。我们根据 NLR tertile 将 216 例患者分为 3 组。我们对 NLR 组间的基线、血管造影和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特征进行了比较分析,并进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估 NLR 与 ISNA 和支架内薄帽纤维血管瘤(TCFA)的相关性。与第一分位数的患者相比,第三分位数NLR组患者的ISNA和支架内TCFA发生率更高。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,与最低三等分组相比,最高三等分组患者 ISNA 和 TCFA 的危险比和 95% 置信区间分别为 2.673 (1.257-5.684; P = 0.038) 和 4.272 (1.740-10.488; P = 0.004)。我们的研究表明,在植入 DES 后出现 ISR 的患者中,NLR 增加与 ISNA 和支架内斑块脆性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
367
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and pertinent review articles on basic and clinical aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology. The Journal encourages submission in all aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology/medicine including, but not limited to: stroke, kidney disease, lipid disorders, diabetes, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, cancer angiogenesis, neural and hormonal control of the circulation, sepsis, neurodegenerative diseases with a vascular component, cardiac and vascular remodeling, heart failure, angina, anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents, drugs/agents that affect vascular smooth muscle, and arrhythmias. Appropriate subjects include new drug development and evaluation, physiological and pharmacological bases of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions and side effects, application of drugs to gain novel insights into physiology or pathological conditions, clinical results with new and established agents, and novel methods. The focus is on pharmacology in its broadest applications, incorporating not only traditional approaches, but new approaches to the development of pharmacological agents and the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Please note that JCVP does not publish work based on biological extracts of mixed and uncertain chemical composition or unknown concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信