Evaluating the Impact of Complaints on Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk: The Roles of Valance and Channel

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Baoqiang Zhan;Yongli Li;Chuang Wei;Chong Wu;Eric W. T. Ngai
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Complaints on Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk: The Roles of Valance and Channel","authors":"Baoqiang Zhan;Yongli Li;Chuang Wei;Chong Wu;Eric W. T. Ngai","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3485088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms increasingly rely on the third-party platforms to manage customer complaints. In this article, we explore the impact of complaints on firms’ idiosyncratic risk by considering both the valence and channel characteristics of complaints. Through textual analysis, complaints are categorized into four types based on the intersection of two dimensions: the valence (mild or severe) of the complaint and the channel (firm or platform) through which the complaint is lodged. Empirical analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses. The results reveal that firms’ idiosyncratic risk rises after severe complaints but decreases after mild complaints. Moreover, while mild platform-channel complaints increase risk, severe platform-channel complaints reduce risk. This study highlights the disparate impacts of the channel and valence of complaints on manufacturing and service firms. This research contributes to the literature on online complaints and the marketing–finance interface, offering valuable insights for firms seeking to mitigate their idiosyncratic risk through complaint management strategies.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"15333-15348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10729660/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firms increasingly rely on the third-party platforms to manage customer complaints. In this article, we explore the impact of complaints on firms’ idiosyncratic risk by considering both the valence and channel characteristics of complaints. Through textual analysis, complaints are categorized into four types based on the intersection of two dimensions: the valence (mild or severe) of the complaint and the channel (firm or platform) through which the complaint is lodged. Empirical analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses. The results reveal that firms’ idiosyncratic risk rises after severe complaints but decreases after mild complaints. Moreover, while mild platform-channel complaints increase risk, severe platform-channel complaints reduce risk. This study highlights the disparate impacts of the channel and valence of complaints on manufacturing and service firms. This research contributes to the literature on online complaints and the marketing–finance interface, offering valuable insights for firms seeking to mitigate their idiosyncratic risk through complaint management strategies.
评估投诉对公司偶发性风险的影响:估值和渠道的作用
企业越来越依赖第三方平台来管理客户投诉。在本文中,我们通过考虑投诉的价值和渠道特征来探讨投诉对企业特异性风险的影响。通过文本分析,根据投诉的价值(轻微或严重)和投诉渠道(企业或平台)两个维度的交叉点,将投诉分为四种类型。为验证假设,我们进行了实证分析。结果显示,企业的特异性风险在严重投诉后上升,但在轻度投诉后下降。此外,轻微的平台渠道投诉会增加风险,而严重的平台渠道投诉则会降低风险。这项研究凸显了投诉渠道和情绪对制造业和服务业企业的不同影响。这项研究为有关在线投诉和营销-金融界面的文献做出了贡献,为企业寻求通过投诉管理策略降低其特殊风险提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信