Women's Perspectives on the Unique Benefits and Challenges of Self‐Injectable Contraception: A Four‐Country In‐Depth Interview Study in Sub‐Saharan Africa

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Emily Himes, Lauren Suchman, Martha Kamanga, Catherine Birabwa, Serah Gitome, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Sarah Okumu, Grace Nmadu, Zachary Kwena, Jenny Liu, Sneha Challa, Dinah Amongin, Pauline Wekesa, Louisa Ndunyu, Elizabeth Bukusi, Address Malata, Lynn Atuyambe, Mandayachepa Nyando, Chioma Okoli, Aminat Tijani, Janelli Vallin, Ayobambo Jegede, Shakede Dimowo, Alfred Maluwa, Phoebe Alitubeera, Betty Kaudha, Agnes Kayego, Tamandani Jumbe, Innocencia Mtalimanja, Peter Waiswa, Beth Phillips, Kelsey Holt
{"title":"Women's Perspectives on the Unique Benefits and Challenges of Self‐Injectable Contraception: A Four‐Country In‐Depth Interview Study in Sub‐Saharan Africa","authors":"Emily Himes, Lauren Suchman, Martha Kamanga, Catherine Birabwa, Serah Gitome, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Sarah Okumu, Grace Nmadu, Zachary Kwena, Jenny Liu, Sneha Challa, Dinah Amongin, Pauline Wekesa, Louisa Ndunyu, Elizabeth Bukusi, Address Malata, Lynn Atuyambe, Mandayachepa Nyando, Chioma Okoli, Aminat Tijani, Janelli Vallin, Ayobambo Jegede, Shakede Dimowo, Alfred Maluwa, Phoebe Alitubeera, Betty Kaudha, Agnes Kayego, Tamandani Jumbe, Innocencia Mtalimanja, Peter Waiswa, Beth Phillips, Kelsey Holt","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementing self‐injection (SI) of subcutaneous depot‐medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA‐SC) is a key self‐care strategy for sexual and reproductive health, but SI uptake remains low, and assertions about the potential of SI to increase women's control over contraceptive use lack evidence. We sought to qualitatively explore how women with diverse contraceptive experiences—including those with and without experience using SI—view the benefits and challenges of SI as compared to other methods. We conducted 241 in‐depth interviews with women across four sub‐Saharan African countries and found alignment between the perceived and experienced benefits of SI across our diverse sample. Through the benefits of privacy, easier access, and self‐management, we found SI can promote greater control over the contraceptive experience by facilitating a woman's ability to act on her preferences and control who is involved in or aware of her contraceptive use. Interviews revealed SI's potential is, however, constrained by inherent limitations in the method; for example, it is often not private or accessible <jats:italic>enough</jats:italic> and many fear injecting themselves. SI has the most potential when implemented with programmatic solutions that mitigate challenges women experience or anticipate and allow more women to benefit from the privacy, easier access, and self‐management that SI offers.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementing self‐injection (SI) of subcutaneous depot‐medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA‐SC) is a key self‐care strategy for sexual and reproductive health, but SI uptake remains low, and assertions about the potential of SI to increase women's control over contraceptive use lack evidence. We sought to qualitatively explore how women with diverse contraceptive experiences—including those with and without experience using SI—view the benefits and challenges of SI as compared to other methods. We conducted 241 in‐depth interviews with women across four sub‐Saharan African countries and found alignment between the perceived and experienced benefits of SI across our diverse sample. Through the benefits of privacy, easier access, and self‐management, we found SI can promote greater control over the contraceptive experience by facilitating a woman's ability to act on her preferences and control who is involved in or aware of her contraceptive use. Interviews revealed SI's potential is, however, constrained by inherent limitations in the method; for example, it is often not private or accessible enough and many fear injecting themselves. SI has the most potential when implemented with programmatic solutions that mitigate challenges women experience or anticipate and allow more women to benefit from the privacy, easier access, and self‐management that SI offers.
妇女对自我注射避孕的独特益处和挑战的看法:撒哈拉以南非洲四国深入访谈研究
实施醋酸甲地孕酮皮下埋植剂(DMPA-SC)的自我注射(SI)是性健康和生殖健康的一项重要自我保健策略,但 SI 的使用率仍然很低,关于 SI 有可能增强女性对避孕药具使用的控制的说法也缺乏证据。我们试图从定性角度探讨具有不同避孕经验的女性(包括具有和不具有使用体外射精经验的女性)如何看待体外射精与其他方法相比所带来的益处和挑战。我们对撒哈拉以南非洲四个国家的妇女进行了 241 次深入访谈,发现在我们不同的样本中,她们对人工流产好处的看法和体验是一致的。我们发现,通过隐私、更容易获得和自我管理等好处,SI 可以促进妇女根据自己的偏好采取行动,并控制谁参与或了解其避孕方法的使用,从而加强对避孕体验的控制。然而,访谈显示,SI 的潜力受到该方法固有局限的制约;例如,它往往不够私密或不够方便,许多人害怕自己注射。在实施个体化人工流产的过程中,如果能采取方案解决方案,减轻妇女遇到或预计会遇到的挑战,并让更多妇女从个体化人工流产提供的隐私、更易获取和自我管理中受益,那么这种方法的潜力就会最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信