Nonsurgical Interventions for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sarah Elhachimi, David Z Liao, Mingyang Gray, Joshua Rosenberg
{"title":"Nonsurgical Interventions for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sarah Elhachimi, David Z Liao, Mingyang Gray, Joshua Rosenberg","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> Systematic review will improve understanding of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques, which are useful alternatives or adjuncts to surgical gender affirmation. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques in patients seeking gender-affirming feminization by reviewing the literature for patient-reported, subjective, and objective outcomes of feminization. <b>Evidence Review:</b> A comprehensive database search was conducted through July 28, 2022. A total of 264 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Of all, 48 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review, and 20 articles were included in the final data extraction. <b>Findings:</b> The most described nonsurgical facial feminization techniques were neurotoxins, fillers, and hair removal. Techniques were derived from cisgender cosmetic procedures to achieve feminine qualities. The most common study type was expert opinion or literature reviews. There were only two studies that analyzed measurable nonsurgical facial feminization techniques. <b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> There is a lack of high-quality prospective research and randomized, controlled trials specific to the transgender patient population that evaluate outcomes, patient satisfaction, or complications. Such studies are needed to inform evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Systematic review will improve understanding of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques, which are useful alternatives or adjuncts to surgical gender affirmation. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical facial feminization techniques in patients seeking gender-affirming feminization by reviewing the literature for patient-reported, subjective, and objective outcomes of feminization. Evidence Review: A comprehensive database search was conducted through July 28, 2022. A total of 264 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Of all, 48 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review, and 20 articles were included in the final data extraction. Findings: The most described nonsurgical facial feminization techniques were neurotoxins, fillers, and hair removal. Techniques were derived from cisgender cosmetic procedures to achieve feminine qualities. The most common study type was expert opinion or literature reviews. There were only two studies that analyzed measurable nonsurgical facial feminization techniques. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a lack of high-quality prospective research and randomized, controlled trials specific to the transgender patient population that evaluate outcomes, patient satisfaction, or complications. Such studies are needed to inform evidence-based practices.

非手术干预的性别确认面部女性化:范围审查。
重要性:系统性综述将加深人们对非手术面部女性化技术的了解,这些技术是手术确认性别的有效替代方法或辅助手段。目的: 确定非手术面部女性化技术对寻求性别确认的患者的有效性:通过回顾有关女性化患者报告、主观和客观结果的文献,确定非手术面部女性化技术对寻求性别确认女性化患者的有效性。证据回顾:截至 2022 年 7 月 28 日,我们进行了一次全面的数据库检索。两位独立审稿人在 Covidence 系统中筛选了 264 篇标题和摘要。其中,48篇符合全文审阅的纳入标准,20篇文章被纳入最终数据提取。研究结果描述最多的非手术面部女性化技术是神经毒素、填充剂和脱毛。这些技术都是从顺性别整容手术中衍生出来的,以达到女性化的效果。最常见的研究类型是专家意见或文献综述。只有两项研究分析了可测量的非手术面部女性化技术。结论与相关性:目前还缺乏专门针对变性患者群体的高质量前瞻性研究和随机对照试验来评估结果、患者满意度或并发症。我们需要此类研究为循证实践提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信