Assessing ChatGPT's cybersecurity implications in Saudi Arabian healthcare and education sectors: A comparative study.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan
{"title":"Assessing ChatGPT's cybersecurity implications in Saudi Arabian healthcare and education sectors: A comparative study.","authors":"Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan","doi":"10.1177/02601060241289975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study purpose: </strong>This study aims to critically evaluate ChatGPT's impact on cybersecurity in healthcare and education sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional survey design, collecting data from healthcare and educational professionals in Saudi Arabia through a structured questionnaire, with 205 healthcare workers' and 214 educators. The survey assessed perceptions of ChatGPT's impact on cybersecurity opportunities and challenges, with data analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA to explore differences across professional roles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals viewed artificial intelligence (AI) more favorably (mean scores 4.24 and 4.14) than those in education, who showed moderate enthusiasm (mean scores 2.55 to 3.54). Concerns over data privacy and the cost of securing AI were significant, with high mean scores of 3.59 indicating widespread apprehension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A balanced approach to ChatGPT's integration that carefully considers ethical implications, data privacy, and the technology's dual-use potential is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241289975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241289975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purpose: This study aims to critically evaluate ChatGPT's impact on cybersecurity in healthcare and education sectors.

Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional survey design, collecting data from healthcare and educational professionals in Saudi Arabia through a structured questionnaire, with 205 healthcare workers' and 214 educators. The survey assessed perceptions of ChatGPT's impact on cybersecurity opportunities and challenges, with data analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA to explore differences across professional roles.

Results: Healthcare professionals viewed artificial intelligence (AI) more favorably (mean scores 4.24 and 4.14) than those in education, who showed moderate enthusiasm (mean scores 2.55 to 3.54). Concerns over data privacy and the cost of securing AI were significant, with high mean scores of 3.59 indicating widespread apprehension.

Conclusion: A balanced approach to ChatGPT's integration that carefully considers ethical implications, data privacy, and the technology's dual-use potential is required.

评估 ChatGPT 对沙特阿拉伯医疗保健和教育部门网络安全的影响:比较研究。
研究目的:本研究旨在批判性地评估 ChatGPT 对医疗保健和教育部门网络安全的影响:本研究采用横断面调查设计,通过结构化问卷向沙特阿拉伯的医疗保健和教育专业人士收集数据,其中包括 205 名医疗保健工作者和 214 名教育工作者。调查评估了对 ChatGPT 对网络安全机遇和挑战的影响的看法,并使用描述性统计和方差分析对数据进行了分析,以探索不同专业角色之间的差异:医疗保健专业人员对人工智能(AI)的看法(平均分 4.24 分和 4.14 分)高于教育工作者,后者表现出适度的热情(平均分 2.55 分至 3.54 分)。对数据隐私和人工智能安全成本的担忧非常明显,3.59 的高平均分表明了普遍的忧虑:结论:在整合 ChatGPT 时,需要采取一种平衡的方法,仔细考虑道德影响、数据隐私和技术的双重用途潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信