Interpreting the direct- and derived-Trail Making Test scores in Argentinian children: regression-based norms, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and practice effects.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vanessa Arán Filippetti, Marisel Gutierrez
{"title":"Interpreting the direct- and derived-Trail Making Test scores in Argentinian children: regression-based norms, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and practice effects.","authors":"Vanessa Arán Filippetti, Marisel Gutierrez","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2423414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We carried out two research studies (using a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design) to establish regression-based normative data, and to examine the convergent validity, the test-retest reliability, and the changes in performance with practice (1-month and 1-year interval) of the direct- and derived- (B-A, B + A, and B/A ratio) Trail Making Test (TMT) scores in Spanish-speaking children. <b>Method:</b> In S1 (<i>n</i> = 413 6- to 15-year-old children and adolescents), regression-based norming procedure and partial correlations were employed. In S2 (<i>n</i> = 110 6- to 12-year-old children), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>), Pearson's r-product-moment correlations, and paired t-tests were used. <b>Results:</b> S1 demonstrated that age was associated with better performance on both TMT-A and TMT-B. This improvement was more strongly related to direct scores than derived measures B-A and B/A. Additionally, TMT-B was found to be more related to other executive functions (EF) compared to the performance of TMT-A. Among the derived scores, only the B-A was related primarily to cognitive flexibility, while the B + A index was associated with most EF, suggesting a general measure of cognitive functioning. In S2, fair to good test-retest reliability coefficients were found at Time 2 for TMT-A and TMT-B, as well as the B + A index, both in 6 to 8-year-olds (ICCs .61 to .74) and 9 to 12-year-olds (ICCs .53 to .65). There was a significant increase in performance on TMT-A and TMT-B from the first assessment (Time 1) to the follow-up testing at Time 2 in older children. However, this significant improvement was not observed for TMT-B in the younger group. Test scores on the TMT direct measures improved significantly across 1-year. The B-A and B/A ratio scores did not change across examinations. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings have important implications for assessing EF and developing interventions that target cognitive flexibility in pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2423414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We carried out two research studies (using a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design) to establish regression-based normative data, and to examine the convergent validity, the test-retest reliability, and the changes in performance with practice (1-month and 1-year interval) of the direct- and derived- (B-A, B + A, and B/A ratio) Trail Making Test (TMT) scores in Spanish-speaking children. Method: In S1 (n = 413 6- to 15-year-old children and adolescents), regression-based norming procedure and partial correlations were employed. In S2 (n = 110 6- to 12-year-old children), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), Pearson's r-product-moment correlations, and paired t-tests were used. Results: S1 demonstrated that age was associated with better performance on both TMT-A and TMT-B. This improvement was more strongly related to direct scores than derived measures B-A and B/A. Additionally, TMT-B was found to be more related to other executive functions (EF) compared to the performance of TMT-A. Among the derived scores, only the B-A was related primarily to cognitive flexibility, while the B + A index was associated with most EF, suggesting a general measure of cognitive functioning. In S2, fair to good test-retest reliability coefficients were found at Time 2 for TMT-A and TMT-B, as well as the B + A index, both in 6 to 8-year-olds (ICCs .61 to .74) and 9 to 12-year-olds (ICCs .53 to .65). There was a significant increase in performance on TMT-A and TMT-B from the first assessment (Time 1) to the follow-up testing at Time 2 in older children. However, this significant improvement was not observed for TMT-B in the younger group. Test scores on the TMT direct measures improved significantly across 1-year. The B-A and B/A ratio scores did not change across examinations. Conclusions: These findings have important implications for assessing EF and developing interventions that target cognitive flexibility in pediatric populations.

解读阿根廷儿童的直接和推导路径制作测验分数:基于回归的标准、收敛有效性、重测可靠性和练习效应。
研究目的我们进行了两项研究(采用横断面和纵向设计),以建立基于回归的常模数据,并考察西班牙语儿童直接和推导(B-A、B + A 和 B/A 比率)路径制作测试(TMT)分数的收敛有效性、重测可靠性以及随练习(间隔 1 个月和 1 年)而产生的成绩变化。测试方法在 S1(n = 413 名 6 至 15 岁的儿童和青少年)中,采用了基于回归的标准程序和部分相关性。在 S2(n = 110 名 6 至 12 岁儿童)中,采用了类内相关系数 (ICC2,1)、Pearson's r-product-moment相关性和配对 t 检验。结果显示S1 表明,年龄与 TMT-A 和 TMT-B 的较佳表现相关。这种提高与直接得分的关系比衍生测量 B-A 和 B/A 更密切。此外,与 TMT-A 的表现相比,TMT-B 与其他执行功能 (EF) 的关系更为密切。在推导分数中,只有 B-A 主要与认知灵活性相关,而 B + A 指数与大多数 EF 相关,这表明它是认知功能的一般测量方法。在 S2 中,6 至 8 岁儿童(ICC 为 0.61 至 0.74)和 9 至 12 岁儿童(ICC 为 0.53 至 0.65)的 TMT-A 和 TMT-B 以及 B + A 指数在第 2 次测试时的信度系数为一般至良好。从第一次评估(时间 1)到第二次跟踪测试,年龄较大的儿童在 TMT-A 和 TMT-B 方面的表现均有明显提高。但是,在年龄较小的组别中,TMT-B 的成绩没有明显提高。TMT 直接测量的测试分数在 1 年内有明显提高。B-A和B/A比率得分在各次测试中均无变化。结论:这些发现对评估儿童的EF和制定针对儿童认知灵活性的干预措施具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信