Xinjie Zha , Jialu An , Liyuan Deng , Xue Gao , Yuan Tian
{"title":"Risk assessment and source apportionment of heavy metals in the soil–water-grain system in a typical area of the central Qinghai–Tibet Plateau","authors":"Xinjie Zha , Jialu An , Liyuan Deng , Xue Gao , Yuan Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heavy metals (HMs) within the soil–water-grain system have substantial effects on both eco-environmental and human health. This study collected 232 samples (58 surface soil, 89 drinking water, and 85 highland barley) from the central Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) and analyzed the contamination characteristics, source apportionments, and associated risks of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb). The study employed geochemical normalization factors, biotoxicity assessment methods, ecological risk and health risk assessment models, and the Positive matrix factorization (PMF) model to assess the soil–water-grain system. The results showed no accumulation of HMs in highland barley, and no biotoxicity was observed. Soil was identified as the primary medium contributing to ecological and health risks, with overall risk levels ranging from slight to moderate, particularly higher in the northern and eastern regions of the study area. Cr posed non-carcinogenic risks to local children in 100% of cases and to adults in 27.27% of cases. Pb presented non-carcinogenic risks in 81.82% of cases for children and 36.36% for adults. Furthermore, As, Cd, and Cr were found to pose carcinogenic risks to both children and adults. Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were more pronounced in children than in adults. Children’s health risks were primarily driven by As concentrations in grains, with a sensitivity contribution exceeding 90%. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) indicated that ingestion rates were more sensitive for children, while body weight showed an inverse relationship. The PMF model identified three potential sources of HMs: anthropogenic, geogenic, and environmental. Therefore, to ensure the sustainable development of ecology and the health of residents, it is urgent to conduct routine soil remediation and maintain a balanced diet to mitigate the migration and transformation of HMs in the study area and improve the health level of residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112801"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heavy metals (HMs) within the soil–water-grain system have substantial effects on both eco-environmental and human health. This study collected 232 samples (58 surface soil, 89 drinking water, and 85 highland barley) from the central Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) and analyzed the contamination characteristics, source apportionments, and associated risks of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb). The study employed geochemical normalization factors, biotoxicity assessment methods, ecological risk and health risk assessment models, and the Positive matrix factorization (PMF) model to assess the soil–water-grain system. The results showed no accumulation of HMs in highland barley, and no biotoxicity was observed. Soil was identified as the primary medium contributing to ecological and health risks, with overall risk levels ranging from slight to moderate, particularly higher in the northern and eastern regions of the study area. Cr posed non-carcinogenic risks to local children in 100% of cases and to adults in 27.27% of cases. Pb presented non-carcinogenic risks in 81.82% of cases for children and 36.36% for adults. Furthermore, As, Cd, and Cr were found to pose carcinogenic risks to both children and adults. Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were more pronounced in children than in adults. Children’s health risks were primarily driven by As concentrations in grains, with a sensitivity contribution exceeding 90%. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) indicated that ingestion rates were more sensitive for children, while body weight showed an inverse relationship. The PMF model identified three potential sources of HMs: anthropogenic, geogenic, and environmental. Therefore, to ensure the sustainable development of ecology and the health of residents, it is urgent to conduct routine soil remediation and maintain a balanced diet to mitigate the migration and transformation of HMs in the study area and improve the health level of residents.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.