Latent class approach to classify e-scooter non-users: A comparative study of Helsinki and Tokyo

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Samira Dibaj , Hizaki Keiichi , Rie Goto , Ayako Taniguchi , Miloš N. Mladenović
{"title":"Latent class approach to classify e-scooter non-users: A comparative study of Helsinki and Tokyo","authors":"Samira Dibaj ,&nbsp;Hizaki Keiichi ,&nbsp;Rie Goto ,&nbsp;Ayako Taniguchi ,&nbsp;Miloš N. Mladenović","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent years have seen a rapid deployment of shared electric scooters (e-scooters), across hundreds of cities worldwide. Despite the global diffusion, most urban residents are still not using e-scooters, and they often bear the negative consequences of e- scooter deployment. This comparative study investigates the attitudes and characteristics of the e-scooter non-users in Helsinki, Finland and Tokyo, Japan using latent class clustering analysis. Our findings reveal five classes of e-scooter non-users, ranging from very negative perspectives to the least negative perspectives towards e-scooter deployment. Non-users also have a diverse set of socio-demographics background, including variation across age, gender, and income. In addition, non-users mostly do not feel the necessity of using an e-scooter as well as lack competences and have safety concerns. Safety concerns are dominant among those with more negative perceptions, while classes with the least negative perceptions and low income tend to not use e-scooters due to high rental costs. Understanding the different categories and perspectives of non-users, alongside with understanding users, has clear smart mobility policy and management implications. On the one hand, it should help with understanding the effectiveness of different interventions stemming from e-scooter operators and public policy actors. On the other hand, this study’s findings contribute to understanding public acceptability of e-scooter technology and associated policy and management actions. The study also opens further pathways for both comparative studies and for understanding different groups of users and non-users of smart mobility technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100941"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24002047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen a rapid deployment of shared electric scooters (e-scooters), across hundreds of cities worldwide. Despite the global diffusion, most urban residents are still not using e-scooters, and they often bear the negative consequences of e- scooter deployment. This comparative study investigates the attitudes and characteristics of the e-scooter non-users in Helsinki, Finland and Tokyo, Japan using latent class clustering analysis. Our findings reveal five classes of e-scooter non-users, ranging from very negative perspectives to the least negative perspectives towards e-scooter deployment. Non-users also have a diverse set of socio-demographics background, including variation across age, gender, and income. In addition, non-users mostly do not feel the necessity of using an e-scooter as well as lack competences and have safety concerns. Safety concerns are dominant among those with more negative perceptions, while classes with the least negative perceptions and low income tend to not use e-scooters due to high rental costs. Understanding the different categories and perspectives of non-users, alongside with understanding users, has clear smart mobility policy and management implications. On the one hand, it should help with understanding the effectiveness of different interventions stemming from e-scooter operators and public policy actors. On the other hand, this study’s findings contribute to understanding public acceptability of e-scooter technology and associated policy and management actions. The study also opens further pathways for both comparative studies and for understanding different groups of users and non-users of smart mobility technologies.
对不使用电动摩托车者进行分类的潜在类方法:赫尔辛基和东京的比较研究
近年来,共享电动滑板车(电动滑板车)在全球数百个城市迅速普及。尽管电动滑板车已在全球普及,但大多数城市居民仍然不使用电动滑板车,他们往往要承担电动滑板车使用带来的负面影响。这项比较研究采用潜类聚类分析方法,调查了芬兰赫尔辛基和日本东京不使用电动滑板车的人的态度和特征。我们的研究结果显示,非电动滑板车用户分为五类,从对使用电动滑板车持非常消极的观点到最不消极的观点不等。非用户的社会人口背景也各不相同,包括年龄、性别和收入方面的差异。此外,非使用者大多认为没有必要使用电动代步车,而且缺乏能力和存在安全顾虑。在负面看法较多的人群中,安全顾虑占主导地位,而负面看法最少且收入较低的人群则倾向于不使用电动代步车,原因是租车费用较高。在了解使用者的同时,了解非使用者的不同类别和观点,对智能交通政策和管理具有明显的意义。一方面,它有助于了解电动代步车运营商和公共政策参与者采取的不同干预措施的有效性。另一方面,本研究的发现有助于了解公众对电动摩托车技术的接受程度以及相关的政策和管理措施。本研究还为开展比较研究以及了解智能交通技术的不同用户群体和非用户群体开辟了更多途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信