Long-term quality of life after open and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi-institutional study (CCOG1504)

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chie Tanaka, Mitsuro Kanda, Kazunari Misawa, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Masashi Hattori, Satoshi Sueoka, Takuya Watanabe, Takanobu Yamada, Kenta Murotani, Yasuhiro Kodera
{"title":"Long-term quality of life after open and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: A prospective multi-institutional study (CCOG1504)","authors":"Chie Tanaka,&nbsp;Mitsuro Kanda,&nbsp;Kazunari Misawa,&nbsp;Yoshinari Mochizuki,&nbsp;Masashi Hattori,&nbsp;Satoshi Sueoka,&nbsp;Takuya Watanabe,&nbsp;Takanobu Yamada,&nbsp;Kenta Murotani,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kodera","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Little information is available from prospective clinical trials on the influences of surgical approaches on postoperative quality of life (QOL). We aimed to prospectively compare chronological changes in postoperative body weight and QOL between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer (GC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1504) of patients who undergo laparoscopic or open total gastrectomy. Body weight was measured at the baseline and at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative years (POY). QOL using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30 <b>(</b>EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaires were measured at the baseline and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 36th postoperative months (POM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 84 patients from 15 institutions, and finally 43 patients for the laparoscopic group and 16 for the open group were eligible for data analysis. There were no significant differences in body weight change between the two groups. The role functioning score among the EORTC QLQ-C30 tended to be higher (i.e., better QOL) in the laparoscopic group at POM 1 and 12 after surgery compared to the open group. The dissatisfaction at working score among the PGSAS-37 at 1 month after surgery was lower (i.e. better QOL) in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results of CCOG1504 indicated that laparoscopic approach for total gastrectomy was associated with a more favorable dissatisfaction at working score (PGSAS-37).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"8 6","pages":"999-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little information is available from prospective clinical trials on the influences of surgical approaches on postoperative quality of life (QOL). We aimed to prospectively compare chronological changes in postoperative body weight and QOL between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study (CCOG1504) of patients who undergo laparoscopic or open total gastrectomy. Body weight was measured at the baseline and at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative years (POY). QOL using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaires were measured at the baseline and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 36th postoperative months (POM).

Results

We enrolled 84 patients from 15 institutions, and finally 43 patients for the laparoscopic group and 16 for the open group were eligible for data analysis. There were no significant differences in body weight change between the two groups. The role functioning score among the EORTC QLQ-C30 tended to be higher (i.e., better QOL) in the laparoscopic group at POM 1 and 12 after surgery compared to the open group. The dissatisfaction at working score among the PGSAS-37 at 1 month after surgery was lower (i.e. better QOL) in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group.

Conclusions

The results of CCOG1504 indicated that laparoscopic approach for total gastrectomy was associated with a more favorable dissatisfaction at working score (PGSAS-37).

Abstract Image

I期胃癌开腹和腹腔镜全胃切除术后的长期生活质量:一项多机构前瞻性研究(CCOG1504)。
背景:关于手术方法对术后生活质量(QOL)影响的前瞻性临床试验资料很少。我们旨在前瞻性地比较 I 期胃癌(GC)腹腔镜和开腹全胃切除术术后体重和 QOL 的时间变化:我们对接受腹腔镜或开腹全胃切除术的患者进行了一项多机构前瞻性研究(CCOG1504)。在基线和术后第 1、第 2 和第 3 年(POY)测量体重。在基线和术后第 1、3、6、12 和 36 个月 (POM) 时,使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) 和胃切除术后综合征评估量表-37 (PGSAS-37) 问卷测量生活质量:我们从 15 家机构招募了 84 名患者,最终有 43 名腹腔镜组患者和 16 名开腹组患者符合数据分析条件。两组患者的体重变化无明显差异。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组患者在术后POM 1和12时的EORTC QLQ-C30中的角色功能得分往往更高(即QOL更好)。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组在术后1个月的PGSAS-37中的工作不满意度得分更低(即QOL更好):CCOG1504的研究结果表明,腹腔镜全胃切除术的不满意度评分(PGSAS-37)更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信