Joint production, maintenance, and quality control in manufacturing systems with imperfect inspection

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Abdessamad Ait El Cadi , Ali Gharbi , Karem Dhouib , Abdelhakim Artiba
{"title":"Joint production, maintenance, and quality control in manufacturing systems with imperfect inspection","authors":"Abdessamad Ait El Cadi ,&nbsp;Ali Gharbi ,&nbsp;Karem Dhouib ,&nbsp;Abdelhakim Artiba","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposed a joint production control, preventive maintenance, and inspection policy for manufacturing systems prone to failures, quality degradation and quality inspection errors. A stochastic mathematical model is developed taking into account all possible scenarios contingent to imperfect quality inspection errors, while integrating age-based preventive maintenance, dynamic production rates, and sampling inspection plans. The model accounts for both Type I and Type II inspection errors and optimizes the joint policy key parameters, including safety stock levels, preventive maintenance thresholds, and inspection sample size. The model is validated using a 95 % confidence interval obtained from experiments with simulation model that imitates the studied system dynamics when it is controlled by the proposed joint policy. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to give a deeper comprehension of the problem and the complex interactions at play. The study explores the impact of system’s parameters on the new joint policy that accounts for inspection errors, thereby contributing valuable insights to the field of manufacturing systems management. Ultimately, a comprehensive comparative analysis seeks to establish the superiority of the proposed joint policy over existing ones documented in the literature. The proposed policy consistently outperformed alternative approaches, with an overall cost reduction of up to 87 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","volume":"77 ","pages":"Pages 848-858"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612524002486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposed a joint production control, preventive maintenance, and inspection policy for manufacturing systems prone to failures, quality degradation and quality inspection errors. A stochastic mathematical model is developed taking into account all possible scenarios contingent to imperfect quality inspection errors, while integrating age-based preventive maintenance, dynamic production rates, and sampling inspection plans. The model accounts for both Type I and Type II inspection errors and optimizes the joint policy key parameters, including safety stock levels, preventive maintenance thresholds, and inspection sample size. The model is validated using a 95 % confidence interval obtained from experiments with simulation model that imitates the studied system dynamics when it is controlled by the proposed joint policy. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to give a deeper comprehension of the problem and the complex interactions at play. The study explores the impact of system’s parameters on the new joint policy that accounts for inspection errors, thereby contributing valuable insights to the field of manufacturing systems management. Ultimately, a comprehensive comparative analysis seeks to establish the superiority of the proposed joint policy over existing ones documented in the literature. The proposed policy consistently outperformed alternative approaches, with an overall cost reduction of up to 87 %.
不完善检验制造系统中的联合生产、维护和质量控制
本文针对容易发生故障、质量下降和质量检验错误的制造系统,提出了一种生产控制、预防性维护和检验联合政策。该论文建立了一个随机数学模型,考虑了所有可能出现的质量检验误差不完善的情况,同时整合了基于年龄的预防性维护、动态生产率和抽样检验计划。该模型考虑了 I 类和 II 类检验误差,并优化了联合政策的关键参数,包括安全库存水平、预防性维护阈值和检验样本量。该模型通过仿真模型实验获得 95% 的置信区间进行验证,仿真模型模仿了所研究的系统动态,并由建议的联合政策进行控制。为了更深入地理解问题和复杂的相互作用,还进行了敏感性分析。研究探讨了系统参数对考虑检测误差的新联合策略的影响,从而为制造系统管理领域提供了宝贵的见解。最后,通过全面的比较分析,力求确定所提出的联合政策优于文献中记载的现有政策。所提出的政策始终优于其他方法,总体成本降低高达 87%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Journal of Manufacturing Systems 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
23.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
216
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manufacturing Systems is dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge fundamental and applied research in manufacturing at the systems level. Encompassing products, equipment, people, information, control, and support functions, manufacturing systems play a pivotal role in the economical and competitive development, production, delivery, and total lifecycle of products, meeting market and societal needs. With a commitment to publishing archival scholarly literature, the journal strives to advance the state of the art in manufacturing systems and foster innovation in crafting efficient, robust, and sustainable manufacturing systems. The focus extends from equipment-level considerations to the broader scope of the extended enterprise. The Journal welcomes research addressing challenges across various scales, including nano, micro, and macro-scale manufacturing, and spanning diverse sectors such as aerospace, automotive, energy, and medical device manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信