How digital village construction affects to the effectiveness of rural governance? — Research on the NCA and QCA methods

IF 6 1区经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES

Cities Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105514

Zhimin He , Meiling Chen , Dongming Gu

{"title":"How digital village construction affects to the effectiveness of rural governance? — Research on the NCA and QCA methods","authors":"Zhimin He , Meiling Chen , Dongming Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital village construction is not only an effective tool to promote rural revitalization and enhance rural development but also provides crucial support for the modernization and transformation of rural governance (RG). This study utilized a mixed-method approach combining necessary condition analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the 84 pilot districts of digital village policies in China in groups. A combination of factors influenced RG effectiveness in the context of digital village construction at both the social and technical system levels. Moreover, no single antecedent variable was a necessary factor in influencing RG effectiveness. Instead, seven antecedent variables, when combined, created four configurations that improved RG effectiveness. The analysis of regional heterogeneity revealed significant differences between the types of configurations that enhanced RG effectiveness in western China and those in central and eastern China. By revealing the interactions between factors of digital RG, the results provide insights for further enhancing RG effectiveness in the context of digital rural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105514"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital village construction is not only an effective tool to promote rural revitalization and enhance rural development but also provides crucial support for the modernization and transformation of rural governance (RG). This study utilized a mixed-method approach combining necessary condition analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the 84 pilot districts of digital village policies in China in groups. A combination of factors influenced RG effectiveness in the context of digital village construction at both the social and technical system levels. Moreover, no single antecedent variable was a necessary factor in influencing RG effectiveness. Instead, seven antecedent variables, when combined, created four configurations that improved RG effectiveness. The analysis of regional heterogeneity revealed significant differences between the types of configurations that enhanced RG effectiveness in western China and those in central and eastern China. By revealing the interactions between factors of digital RG, the results provide insights for further enhancing RG effectiveness in the context of digital rural development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

数字乡村建设如何影响乡村治理的成效？- NCA和QCA方法研究

数字乡村建设不仅是推动乡村振兴、促进农村发展的有效手段，也为乡村治理现代化转型提供了重要支撑。本研究采用必要条件分析法和模糊集定性比较分析法相结合的混合方法，对中国 84 个数字乡村政策试点地区进行分组分析。在数字乡村建设背景下，社会和技术系统两个层面的综合因素影响了农村治理的有效性。此外，没有任何一个前因变量是影响 RG 效果的必要因素。相反，七个前因变量结合在一起，形成了四种提高地区治理有效性的配置。对地区异质性的分析表明，中国西部地区与中国中部和东部地区提高研究与培训效果的配置类型存在显著差异。通过揭示数字农村发展各因素之间的相互作用，研究结果为在数字农村发展背景下进一步提高农村发展的有效性提供了启示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cities URBAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

9.00%

发文量

517

期刊介绍： Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.