Di Simes, Ian Shochet, Kate Murray, Isobel G Sands
{"title":"Adolescent, caregivers, and therapists' experiences of youth and family suicide intervention: A qualitative study.","authors":"Di Simes, Ian Shochet, Kate Murray, Isobel G Sands","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2415991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the experience of an individual and family therapy youth suicide intervention from the perspectives of seven psychotherapy triads (young people aged 12-18, their parents/caregivers and therapists).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews and analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four domains were identified: Focusing on the youth-parent relationship, individual therapy for young people and their parents, conjoint therapy, and public service structures and systemic practice that facilitated tailored treatment. All participant groups valued intervention that improved the youth-parent relationship; however, they held different views about its influence on suicidality and recovery. Separate youth and parent therapy was crucial for facilitating the tailoring of treatment and enhancing the reparative potential of conjoint therapy. Barriers to productive intervention included inaccessible, fragmented, and siloed treatment that excluded parents, stigmatizing clinician responses, and acute care that was not attuned to need or developmental context. Helpful intervention was systemically and attachment-informed, multi-disciplinary, individually tailored, and integrated freely available specialist therapy with crisis and inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A relational, nuanced, and flexible approach is needed to tailor youth suicide treatment in the context of the complexity of youth-parent relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2415991","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study explores the experience of an individual and family therapy youth suicide intervention from the perspectives of seven psychotherapy triads (young people aged 12-18, their parents/caregivers and therapists).
Method: Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews and analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods.
Results: Four domains were identified: Focusing on the youth-parent relationship, individual therapy for young people and their parents, conjoint therapy, and public service structures and systemic practice that facilitated tailored treatment. All participant groups valued intervention that improved the youth-parent relationship; however, they held different views about its influence on suicidality and recovery. Separate youth and parent therapy was crucial for facilitating the tailoring of treatment and enhancing the reparative potential of conjoint therapy. Barriers to productive intervention included inaccessible, fragmented, and siloed treatment that excluded parents, stigmatizing clinician responses, and acute care that was not attuned to need or developmental context. Helpful intervention was systemically and attachment-informed, multi-disciplinary, individually tailored, and integrated freely available specialist therapy with crisis and inpatient care.
Conclusion: A relational, nuanced, and flexible approach is needed to tailor youth suicide treatment in the context of the complexity of youth-parent relationships.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.