Statin use and ovarian cancer outcomes.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
John P Micha, Mark A Rettenmaier, Randy D Bohart, Bram H Goldstein
{"title":"Statin use and ovarian cancer outcomes.","authors":"John P Micha, Mark A Rettenmaier, Randy D Bohart, Bram H Goldstein","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2426551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ovarian cancer contributed to 13,270 patient deaths in the United States during 2023 and is considered the most aggressive gynecologic malignancy. While surgery, chemotherapy and targeted medications have improved ovarian cancer patient outcomes, novel therapies that further bolster treatment efficacy without compromising toxicity represent an unmet clinical need.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In the current review, we assessed the reported studies involving statin use and ovarian cancer outcomes; a preponderance of the evidence indicated that statins confer a survival benefit in ovarian cancer, especially for patients who underwent treatment post-diagnosis and for a prolonged interval.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The evidence involving a potential survival benefit from statin use in ovarian cancer remains controversial, especially with hydrophilic statins (e.g. pravastatin). While statin users may exhibit better ovarian cancer survival outcomes than non-statin users, additional research should evaluate the putative clinical benefits of statins in ovarian cancer via randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2426551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ovarian cancer contributed to 13,270 patient deaths in the United States during 2023 and is considered the most aggressive gynecologic malignancy. While surgery, chemotherapy and targeted medications have improved ovarian cancer patient outcomes, novel therapies that further bolster treatment efficacy without compromising toxicity represent an unmet clinical need.

Areas covered: In the current review, we assessed the reported studies involving statin use and ovarian cancer outcomes; a preponderance of the evidence indicated that statins confer a survival benefit in ovarian cancer, especially for patients who underwent treatment post-diagnosis and for a prolonged interval.

Expert opinion: The evidence involving a potential survival benefit from statin use in ovarian cancer remains controversial, especially with hydrophilic statins (e.g. pravastatin). While statin users may exhibit better ovarian cancer survival outcomes than non-statin users, additional research should evaluate the putative clinical benefits of statins in ovarian cancer via randomized controlled trials.

他汀类药物的使用与卵巢癌的结果。
导言:2023 年,卵巢癌导致美国 13,270 名患者死亡,被认为是最具侵袭性的妇科恶性肿瘤。虽然手术、化疗和靶向药物改善了卵巢癌患者的预后,但能在不影响毒性的前提下进一步提高治疗效果的新型药物仍是一项尚未满足的临床需求:在本综述中,我们评估了已报道的涉及他汀类药物的使用和卵巢癌预后的研究;大部分证据表明,他汀类药物可使卵巢癌患者生存获益,尤其是对诊断后接受他汀类药物治疗且间隔时间较长的患者:他汀类药物对卵巢癌患者的生存有潜在益处的证据仍存在争议,尤其是亲水性他汀类药物(如普伐他汀)。虽然他汀类药物使用者的卵巢癌存活率可能高于非他汀类药物使用者,但更多的研究应通过随机对照试验来评估他汀类药物对卵巢癌患者存活率的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信