Pervasive biases in proxy genome-wide association studies based on parental history of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

Almost every recent Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genome-wide association study (GWAS) has performed meta-analysis to combine studies with clinical diagnosis of AD with studies that use proxy phenotypes based on parental disease history. Here, we report major limitations in current GWAS-by-proxy (GWAX) practices due to uncorrected survival bias and nonrandom participation in parental illness surveys, which cause substantial discrepancies between AD GWAS and GWAX results. We demonstrate that the current AD GWAX provide highly misleading genetic correlations between AD risk and higher education, which subsequently affects a variety of genetic epidemiological applications involving AD and cognition. Our study sheds light on potential issues in the design and analysis of middle-aged biobank cohorts and underscores the need for caution when interpreting genetic association results based on proxy-reported parental disease history.