Association of Use of Menthol- Versus Tobacco-Flavored ENDS with Switching Completely Away from Cigarettes and Differences by Menthol Cigarette Smoking.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2422963
Arielle Selya, Sooyong Kim, Saul Shiffman, Nicholas I Goldenson
{"title":"Association of Use of Menthol- Versus Tobacco-Flavored ENDS with Switching Completely Away from Cigarettes and Differences by Menthol Cigarette Smoking.","authors":"Arielle Selya, Sooyong Kim, Saul Shiffman, Nicholas I Goldenson","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2422963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menthol cigarettes and menthol-flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a current focus of US regulatory policy considerations. Informed policy requires understanding how ENDS flavor may influence smoking behavior, and whether this association varies by preferred cigarette flavor.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The analytic sample included 8,428 US adults who smoked cigarettes (AWS) in the Adult JUUL Switching and Smoking Trajectories Study and used tobacco- or menthol-flavored JUUL products. Repeated-measures logistic regressions assessed the time-varying association between primary JUUL flavor (menthol vs. tobacco) and switching (no past-30-day smoking) across four follow-ups in year 2 of the study, adjusting for sociodemographics and baseline smoking history. Analyses also examined interactions with cigarette flavor preference (menthol vs. non-menthol).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AWS smoking menthol cigarettes predominantly used menthol-flavored JUUL (∼70% of follow-ups) and had significantly higher switch rates (aOR[95%CI] = 1.30[1.09-1.55]). AWS primarily using menthol-flavored (vs. tobacco-flavored) JUUL had higher odds of switching (aOR = 1.24[1.08-1.43]). The association varied by preferred cigarette flavor: AWS who smoked <i>non</i>-menthol cigarettes had <i>higher</i> odds of switching when using menthol- (vs. tobacco-flavored) JUUL aOR = 1.21[1.05-1.40]). Among AWS who smoked menthol cigarettes, the difference in switching was not significant, but trended in the opposite direction (aOR = 0.94[0.79-1.11] for menthol- vs. tobacco-flavored JUUL). More generally, AWS who used cigarette-<i>incongruen</i>t JUUL flavors (especially non-menthol cigarettes and Menthol-flavored JUUL) had higher odds of switching (aOR = 1.16[1.04-1.29]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Some menthol-flavored ENDS may promote complete switching beyond that facilitated by tobacco-flavored ENDS. Cigarette-<i>incongruent</i> ENDS flavors, especially menthol-flavored ENDS among people who smoke non-menthol cigarettes, may facilitate increased switching.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"311-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2422963","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Menthol cigarettes and menthol-flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a current focus of US regulatory policy considerations. Informed policy requires understanding how ENDS flavor may influence smoking behavior, and whether this association varies by preferred cigarette flavor.

Materials and methods: The analytic sample included 8,428 US adults who smoked cigarettes (AWS) in the Adult JUUL Switching and Smoking Trajectories Study and used tobacco- or menthol-flavored JUUL products. Repeated-measures logistic regressions assessed the time-varying association between primary JUUL flavor (menthol vs. tobacco) and switching (no past-30-day smoking) across four follow-ups in year 2 of the study, adjusting for sociodemographics and baseline smoking history. Analyses also examined interactions with cigarette flavor preference (menthol vs. non-menthol).

Results: AWS smoking menthol cigarettes predominantly used menthol-flavored JUUL (∼70% of follow-ups) and had significantly higher switch rates (aOR[95%CI] = 1.30[1.09-1.55]). AWS primarily using menthol-flavored (vs. tobacco-flavored) JUUL had higher odds of switching (aOR = 1.24[1.08-1.43]). The association varied by preferred cigarette flavor: AWS who smoked non-menthol cigarettes had higher odds of switching when using menthol- (vs. tobacco-flavored) JUUL aOR = 1.21[1.05-1.40]). Among AWS who smoked menthol cigarettes, the difference in switching was not significant, but trended in the opposite direction (aOR = 0.94[0.79-1.11] for menthol- vs. tobacco-flavored JUUL). More generally, AWS who used cigarette-incongruent JUUL flavors (especially non-menthol cigarettes and Menthol-flavored JUUL) had higher odds of switching (aOR = 1.16[1.04-1.29]).

Discussion: Some menthol-flavored ENDS may promote complete switching beyond that facilitated by tobacco-flavored ENDS. Cigarette-incongruent ENDS flavors, especially menthol-flavored ENDS among people who smoke non-menthol cigarettes, may facilitate increased switching.

使用薄荷味和烟草味 ENDS 与完全戒烟的关系以及吸食薄荷卷烟的差异。
导言:薄荷香烟和薄荷味电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)是当前美国监管政策考虑的重点。制定明智的政策需要了解ENDS口味如何影响吸烟行为,以及这种关联是否因偏好的香烟口味而异:分析样本包括《成人 JUUL 转换和吸烟轨迹研究》(Adult JUUL Switching and Smoking Trajectories Study)中吸烟(AWS)并使用烟草或薄荷味 JUUL 产品的 8428 名美国成人。重复测量逻辑回归评估了研究第二年四次随访中主要JUUL口味(薄荷味与烟草味)与转换(过去30天未吸烟)之间的时变关联,并对社会人口统计学和基线吸烟史进行了调整。分析还检验了与香烟口味偏好(薄荷与非薄荷)的交互作用:结果:吸薄荷烟的戒烟者主要使用薄荷味的 JUUL(占随访人数的 70%),其转换率明显更高(aOR[95%CI] = 1.30[1.09-1.55])。主要使用薄荷味(相对于烟草味)JUUL 的吸烟者转吸的几率更高(aOR = 1.24[1.08-1.43])。这种关联因偏好的香烟口味而异:吸食无薄荷醇香烟的戒烟者在使用薄荷醇(与烟草味)JUUL 时转换的几率更高(aOR = 1.21[1.05-1.40])。在吸食薄荷卷烟的戒烟者中,转换的差异并不显著,但趋势相反(薄荷味与烟草味 JUUL 的 aOR = 0.94[0.79-1.11])。一般来说,使用与香烟口味不一致的 JUUL 的戒烟者(尤其是非薄荷醇香烟和薄荷醇口味的 JUUL)转换的几率更高(aOR = 1.16[1.04-1.29]):讨论:一些薄荷味 ENDS 可能会促进完全转换,而烟草味 ENDS 则不会。与香烟口味不一致的ENDS,尤其是吸食非薄荷醇香烟的人吸食薄荷醇口味的ENDS,可能会促使更多的人改吸其他口味的香烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信