A review of burnout among doctors in South Africa: Pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saajida Khan, Itumeleng Ntatamala, Shahieda Adams
{"title":"A review of burnout among doctors in South Africa: Pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Saajida Khan, Itumeleng Ntatamala, Shahieda Adams","doi":"10.4102/safp.v66i1.6002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout is defined as a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress, which has been unsuccessfully managed. By increasing the occupational challenges faced by doctors, the COVID-19 pandemic potentiated their risk for burnout. This review aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative literature review was conducted. PubMed, SCOPUS and EBSCO databases were searched for English publications until April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 cross-sectional studies were included. The prevalence of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities ranged from 4% to 84% pre-pandemic and 58.9% to 78.0% during and post pandemic, respectively. The lower value of the burnout prevalence range was higher during the pandemic. This review confirmed that individual factors (gender, age, marital status, junior status, practice setting) as well as occupational factors (workload, job control, moral distress, health system issues, job satisfaction, support at work and resilience) were associated with burnout in doctors. There was no significant association between burnout and factors related to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While considerable variability exists in the prevalence of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities, pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic, the pandemic resulted in greater burnout rates. Factors associated with burnout include both individual and organisational factors, which need to be addressed to mitigate burnout.Contribution: Mitigation of burnout in South African health facilities should focus on individual-based and context-related interventional measures at an organisational level.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"66 1","pages":"e1-e10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v66i1.6002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout is defined as a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress, which has been unsuccessfully managed. By increasing the occupational challenges faced by doctors, the COVID-19 pandemic potentiated their risk for burnout. This review aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted. PubMed, SCOPUS and EBSCO databases were searched for English publications until April 2024.

Results: A total of 22 cross-sectional studies were included. The prevalence of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities ranged from 4% to 84% pre-pandemic and 58.9% to 78.0% during and post pandemic, respectively. The lower value of the burnout prevalence range was higher during the pandemic. This review confirmed that individual factors (gender, age, marital status, junior status, practice setting) as well as occupational factors (workload, job control, moral distress, health system issues, job satisfaction, support at work and resilience) were associated with burnout in doctors. There was no significant association between burnout and factors related to COVID-19.

Conclusion: While considerable variability exists in the prevalence of burnout among doctors working in South African health facilities, pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic, the pandemic resulted in greater burnout rates. Factors associated with burnout include both individual and organisational factors, which need to be addressed to mitigate burnout.Contribution: Mitigation of burnout in South African health facilities should focus on individual-based and context-related interventional measures at an organisational level.

南非医生职业倦怠回顾:COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后。
背景: 职业倦怠被定义为一种由长期工作压力导致的综合症,这种压力未能得到有效控制。COVID-19 大流行增加了医生面临的职业挑战,从而加剧了他们的职业倦怠风险。本综述旨在确定在南非医疗机构工作的医生在 COVID-19 大流行之前、期间和之后的职业倦怠发生率和决定因素: 方法:进行了叙述性文献综述。在 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 EBSCO 数据库中搜索了截至 2024 年 4 月的英文出版物: 结果:共纳入 22 项横断面研究。在南非医疗机构工作的医生的职业倦怠发生率在大流行前为 4% 至 84%,在大流行期间和之后分别为 58.9% 至 78.0%。在大流行期间,职业倦怠发生率范围的较低值较高。这项研究证实,个人因素(性别、年龄、婚姻状况、资历浅、执业环境)和职业因素(工作量、工作控制、精神压力、卫生系统问题、工作满意度、工作支持和抗压能力)与医生的职业倦怠有关。职业倦怠与COVID-19相关因素之间没有明显联系: 尽管在南非医疗机构工作的医生在 COVID-19 大流行之前、期间和之后的职业倦怠发生率存在很大差异,但大流行导致了更高的职业倦怠发生率。与职业倦怠相关的因素包括个人因素和组织因素,需要解决这些问题以减轻职业倦怠:贡献:减轻南非医疗机构中的职业倦怠应侧重于组织层面基于个人和与环境相关的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信