Double port-a-cath implantation: initial experience in Brazil and technical note tips and tricks: a series report.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Túlio Fabiano de Oliveira Leite
{"title":"Double port-a-cath implantation: initial experience in Brazil and technical note tips and tricks: a series report.","authors":"Túlio Fabiano de Oliveira Leite","doi":"10.1186/s13256-024-04845-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the clinical benefit of double-lumen port catheters in patients receiving chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition concurrently or in those with vascular access failure. The advantages, complications, indications and duration of use of double port-a-cath were considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen Brazilian patients received a double-lumen port catheter that was implanted under ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in the radiologic interventional suite.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All double-lumen port systems were successfully implanted in all patients without immediate complications. The port-a-cath was removed in two patients due to infection of the reservoir. Three deaths occurred due to underlying disease with no correlation to the port-a-cath. No temporal interference between the administration of chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The double-door approach is a safe technique with low complication rates. Indications for use of the dual port are numerous and should be encouraged because of the considerable benefits for critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"18 1","pages":"534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04845-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical benefit of double-lumen port catheters in patients receiving chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition concurrently or in those with vascular access failure. The advantages, complications, indications and duration of use of double port-a-cath were considered.

Methods: Thirteen Brazilian patients received a double-lumen port catheter that was implanted under ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in the radiologic interventional suite.

Results: All double-lumen port systems were successfully implanted in all patients without immediate complications. The port-a-cath was removed in two patients due to infection of the reservoir. Three deaths occurred due to underlying disease with no correlation to the port-a-cath. No temporal interference between the administration of chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition was observed.

Conclusion: The double-door approach is a safe technique with low complication rates. Indications for use of the dual port are numerous and should be encouraged because of the considerable benefits for critically ill patients.

双孔导管植入术:巴西的初步经验及技术说明提示和技巧:系列报告。
研究背景本研究旨在评估双腔端口导管对同时接受化疗和肠外营养的患者或血管通路故障患者的临床益处。研究考虑了双腔导管的优点、并发症、适应症和使用时间:13名巴西患者接受了双腔端口导管,该导管是在放射介入室的超声波和透视引导下植入的:结果:所有患者都成功植入了双腔端口系统,没有出现直接并发症。有两名患者因储水器感染而被移除端口导管。有三例死亡病例是由于潜在疾病引起的,与导管无关。化疗和肠外营养之间没有出现时间上的干扰:结论:双门方法是一种安全的技术,并发症发生率较低。结论:双门方法是一种安全的技术,并发症发生率较低。使用双门方法的适应症很多,而且对重症患者大有裨益,因此应予以鼓励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信