Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for challenging perihilar focal liver lesions: diagnostic accuracy and safety assessment.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Roberto Ceriani, Francesca Colapietro, Roberto Gabbiadini, Arianna Dal Buono, Nicola Pugliese, Chiara Masetti, Luca Brandaleone, Tiziana Ierace, Luigi Solbiati
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for challenging perihilar focal liver lesions: diagnostic accuracy and safety assessment.","authors":"Roberto Ceriani, Francesca Colapietro, Roberto Gabbiadini, Arianna Dal Buono, Nicola Pugliese, Chiara Masetti, Luca Brandaleone, Tiziana Ierace, Luigi Solbiati","doi":"10.1007/s40477-024-00949-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In cases of perihilar focal liver lesions, distinguishing between benign strictures and malignancies is critical to prevent unnecessary surgery. Although the use of contrast-enhanced CT or MRI in combination with clinical and laboratory findings can aid in diagnosis, histologic examination is often necessary. Histologic specimens can be obtained through various techniques, including ERCP-guided brush cytology or intraductal biopsy, cholangioscopy-directed biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). However, these methods have been associated with suboptimal sensitivity and specificity, sometimes leading to inconclusive results. Therefore, ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy (US-guided PB) may play a crucial role, but data is lacking for perihilar lesions. The objective of our study was to assess the technical feasibility and safety of US-guided PB for perihilar lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 20 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided PB of perihilar liver lesions that were not suitable for surgery between June 2018 and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All samples were obtained using a Menghini needle 20G and were adequate for histological examination, with a mean diameter of 12.3 mm (range 3-40 mm). Out of the 20 patients, 11 were diagnosed with malignancy while the remaining 9 had inflammatory or fibrotic tissue samples. No adverse events related to the procedure were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided PB of perihilar liver lesions is a valuable and safe diagnostic approach to consider for patients who are not suitable for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-024-00949-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In cases of perihilar focal liver lesions, distinguishing between benign strictures and malignancies is critical to prevent unnecessary surgery. Although the use of contrast-enhanced CT or MRI in combination with clinical and laboratory findings can aid in diagnosis, histologic examination is often necessary. Histologic specimens can be obtained through various techniques, including ERCP-guided brush cytology or intraductal biopsy, cholangioscopy-directed biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). However, these methods have been associated with suboptimal sensitivity and specificity, sometimes leading to inconclusive results. Therefore, ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy (US-guided PB) may play a crucial role, but data is lacking for perihilar lesions. The objective of our study was to assess the technical feasibility and safety of US-guided PB for perihilar lesions.

Methods: We included 20 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided PB of perihilar liver lesions that were not suitable for surgery between June 2018 and October 2023.

Results: All samples were obtained using a Menghini needle 20G and were adequate for histological examination, with a mean diameter of 12.3 mm (range 3-40 mm). Out of the 20 patients, 11 were diagnosed with malignancy while the remaining 9 had inflammatory or fibrotic tissue samples. No adverse events related to the procedure were reported.

Conclusion: US-guided PB of perihilar liver lesions is a valuable and safe diagnostic approach to consider for patients who are not suitable for surgery.

超声引导下经皮活检治疗具有挑战性的肝周病灶:诊断准确性和安全性评估。
目的:在肝周病灶病例中,区分良性狭窄和恶性肿瘤对于避免不必要的手术至关重要。虽然使用对比增强 CT 或 MRI 结合临床和实验室检查结果有助于诊断,但组织学检查往往是必要的。组织学标本可通过多种技术获得,包括 ERCP 引导下的刷状细胞学检查或导管内活检、胆道镜引导下的活检或内镜超声(EUS)检查。然而,这些方法的灵敏度和特异性都不够理想,有时会导致不确定的结果。因此,超声引导下经皮穿刺活检(US-guided PB)可能会起到至关重要的作用,但目前还缺乏针对肝周病变的数据。我们的研究旨在评估超声引导下经皮穿刺活检治疗肝周病变的技术可行性和安全性:我们纳入了2018年6月至2023年10月期间接受US引导下PB治疗不适合手术的肝周病变的20例连续患者:所有样本均使用 20G 的 Menghini 针获取,样本直径平均为 12.3 毫米(范围为 3-40 毫米),足以进行组织学检查。在 20 例患者中,11 例被诊断为恶性肿瘤,其余 9 例为炎症或纤维化组织样本。没有与手术相关的不良事件报告:结论:对于不适合手术的患者,US引导下肝周病变PB是一种有价值且安全的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信