A repeated gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger improves pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles: a retrospective propensity-matched score analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ao Wang, Xing-Yu Zhou, Yun-Hui Lai, Lin-Zi Ma, Jun Zhang, Song-Yu Huang, Xiao-Fei Zhang, Pei-Ru Chen, An-Lan Wang, Zhe Wang, Yu-Dong Liu, Shi-Ling Chen
{"title":"A repeated gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger improves pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles: a retrospective propensity-matched score analysis.","authors":"Ao Wang, Xing-Yu Zhou, Yun-Hui Lai, Lin-Zi Ma, Jun Zhang, Song-Yu Huang, Xiao-Fei Zhang, Pei-Ru Chen, An-Lan Wang, Zhe Wang, Yu-Dong Liu, Shi-Ling Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03269-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether co-treatment of repeated GnRHa triggers with GnRH antagonist protocols can improve the clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 712 Chinese Han women aged 20-42 undergoing autologous IVF/ICSI-ET with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol were analyzed. The 735 cycles were split into the single (n = 238) and the repeated (n = 497) GnRHa groups. In the single GnRHa group, 0.2 mg of triptorelin was given for oocyte maturation, whereas in the repeated GnRHa group, two doses of 0.2 mg were administered 12 h apart. PSM design was used for a fair comparison. The main study outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), good-quality embryo rate, and fertilization rate. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify all potential factors affecting clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-PSM, analysis of 159 cycles per group showed the repeated GnRHa group outperforming the single GnRHa group in IVF fertilization rates (71.5% vs. 67.7%, P < 0.05) and good-quality embryo rate (47.1% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the repeated GnRHa group achieved higher CPR (72.6% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.05) and LBR (59.7% vs. 43.8%, P < 0.05) in FET cycles. Multivariate logistic regression indicated a significant negative correlation between the use of a single GnRHa trigger and both clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.382, P < 0.05) and live birth (OR = 0.518, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reported that individuals who received a repeated GnRHa trigger exhibited higher CPR and LBR during FET cycles compared to those who received a single dose GnRHa trigger.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03269-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether co-treatment of repeated GnRHa triggers with GnRH antagonist protocols can improve the clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) procedures.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 712 Chinese Han women aged 20-42 undergoing autologous IVF/ICSI-ET with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol were analyzed. The 735 cycles were split into the single (n = 238) and the repeated (n = 497) GnRHa groups. In the single GnRHa group, 0.2 mg of triptorelin was given for oocyte maturation, whereas in the repeated GnRHa group, two doses of 0.2 mg were administered 12 h apart. PSM design was used for a fair comparison. The main study outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), good-quality embryo rate, and fertilization rate. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify all potential factors affecting clinical outcomes.

Results: Post-PSM, analysis of 159 cycles per group showed the repeated GnRHa group outperforming the single GnRHa group in IVF fertilization rates (71.5% vs. 67.7%, P < 0.05) and good-quality embryo rate (47.1% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the repeated GnRHa group achieved higher CPR (72.6% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.05) and LBR (59.7% vs. 43.8%, P < 0.05) in FET cycles. Multivariate logistic regression indicated a significant negative correlation between the use of a single GnRHa trigger and both clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.382, P < 0.05) and live birth (OR = 0.518, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study reported that individuals who received a repeated GnRHa trigger exhibited higher CPR and LBR during FET cycles compared to those who received a single dose GnRHa trigger.

重复促性腺激素释放激素激动剂触发可改善 GnRH 拮抗剂周期中冻融胚胎移植的妊娠结局:一项回顾性倾向匹配评分分析。
目的:评估在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射和胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)过程中,重复GnRHa触发器与GnRH拮抗剂方案联合治疗能否改善临床结果:在这项回顾性研究中,对712名20-42岁的中国汉族女性进行了自体体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射和胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)的分析。这 735 个周期被分为单次 GnRHa 组(n = 238)和重复 GnRHa 组(n = 497)。单次 GnRHa 组在卵母细胞成熟时给予 0.2 毫克曲普瑞林,而重复 GnRHa 组在卵母细胞成熟时两次给予 0.2 毫克曲普瑞林,每次间隔 12 小时。为进行公平比较,采用了 PSM 设计。主要研究结果包括临床妊娠率(CPR)、活产率(LBR)、优质胚胎率和受精率。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定影响临床结果的所有潜在因素:PSM后,对每组159个周期的分析表明,重复GnRHa组的IVF受精率优于单一GnRHa组(71.5% vs. 67.7%,P 结论:我们的研究报告显示,接受重复GnRHa治疗的个体在IVF受精率方面优于单一GnRHa组:我们的研究报告显示,与接受单剂量 GnRHa 触发治疗的患者相比,接受重复 GnRHa 触发治疗的患者在 FET 周期中表现出更高的 CPR 和 LBR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信