Public acceptance of green hydrogen production in Germany

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Johannes Buchner, Klaus Menrad, Thomas Decker
{"title":"Public acceptance of green hydrogen production in Germany","authors":"Johannes Buchner,&nbsp;Klaus Menrad,&nbsp;Thomas Decker","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve greenhouse gas neutrality by 2045, Germany must reduce its CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and German policies aim to ramp up domestic green hydrogen production. So far, green hydrogen production in Germany is still in its early stages, with few existing green hydrogen plants. Amongst other factors, public acceptance is crucial for successfully expanding green hydrogen production. However, few studies have investigated the acceptance of green hydrogen plants or production. Thus, this study aims to identify key factors influencing the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany, focusing on the influence of participation in green hydrogen projects. A nationwide online survey (n = 1203) collected data from 1203 respondents living in regions with existing or planned green hydrogen plants in Germany. A multiple linear regression model identified eight key factors that influence the acceptance, including trust in plant safety, trust in project managers, information, risk/benefit perception, experience with green hydrogen, and gender, all having a significant positive impact on the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany. Conversely, participation in the form of consultation and environmental self-identity negatively influence the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany. The results support political decision-makers and stakeholders in realising future green hydrogen projects with high societal acceptance and address potential concerns, thus facilitating the transition towards a more sustainable energy future in Germany and elsewhere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 115057"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To achieve greenhouse gas neutrality by 2045, Germany must reduce its CO2 emissions, and German policies aim to ramp up domestic green hydrogen production. So far, green hydrogen production in Germany is still in its early stages, with few existing green hydrogen plants. Amongst other factors, public acceptance is crucial for successfully expanding green hydrogen production. However, few studies have investigated the acceptance of green hydrogen plants or production. Thus, this study aims to identify key factors influencing the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany, focusing on the influence of participation in green hydrogen projects. A nationwide online survey (n = 1203) collected data from 1203 respondents living in regions with existing or planned green hydrogen plants in Germany. A multiple linear regression model identified eight key factors that influence the acceptance, including trust in plant safety, trust in project managers, information, risk/benefit perception, experience with green hydrogen, and gender, all having a significant positive impact on the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany. Conversely, participation in the form of consultation and environmental self-identity negatively influence the acceptance of green hydrogen plants in Germany. The results support political decision-makers and stakeholders in realising future green hydrogen projects with high societal acceptance and address potential concerns, thus facilitating the transition towards a more sustainable energy future in Germany and elsewhere.

Abstract Image

德国公众对绿色制氢的接受程度
为了在 2045 年之前实现温室气体中和,德国必须减少二氧化碳排放量,而德国的政策目标是加强国内绿色氢气的生产。到目前为止,德国的绿色制氢仍处于早期阶段,现有的绿色制氢工厂寥寥无几。除其他因素外,公众的接受度对于成功扩大绿色制氢至关重要。然而,很少有研究对绿色制氢工厂或制氢的接受度进行调查。因此,本研究旨在确定影响德国绿色制氢工厂接受度的关键因素,重点关注参与绿色制氢项目的影响。一项全国范围的在线调查(n = 1203)收集了居住在德国现有或计划建设绿色制氢工厂地区的 1203 名受访者的数据。多元线性回归模型确定了影响接受度的八个关键因素,包括对工厂安全的信任、对项目经理的信任、信息、风险/收益认知、绿色制氢经验和性别,这些因素都对德国绿色制氢工厂的接受度有显著的积极影响。相反,咨询形式的参与和环境自我认同对德国绿色制氢工厂的接受度有负面影响。研究结果有助于政治决策者和利益相关者实现未来的绿色氢能项目,使其获得较高的社会认可度,并解决潜在的问题,从而促进德国和其他地区向更可持续的能源未来过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信