Benchmark verification of PIC-DSMC programs

IF 3.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zakari Eckert , Jeremiah J. Boerner , Taylor H. Hall , Russell Hooper , Anne M. Grillet , Jose L. Pacheco
{"title":"Benchmark verification of PIC-DSMC programs","authors":"Zakari Eckert ,&nbsp;Jeremiah J. Boerner ,&nbsp;Taylor H. Hall ,&nbsp;Russell Hooper ,&nbsp;Anne M. Grillet ,&nbsp;Jose L. Pacheco","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine a number of common verification and benchmark problems for Particle-in-Cell and Direct Simulation Monte Carlo codes. Since results, including convergence rates, comparison to analytic solutions, and code-to-code comparisons, for these problems are often used as evidence of correctness for simulation codes, it is necessary to understand what successful verification using one or more of these problems implies about the correctness of the simulation code. To that end, a series of benchmark problems is performed in Aleph, a PIC-DSMC code developed at Sandia National Laboratories, including both at the canonical numerical parameters and others where verification should fail. The results presented suggest that improvements and extensions to current benchmark problems and additional problem specifications would benefit existing and future codes thereby providing greater confidence in predictive results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Physics","volume":"521 ","pages":"Article 113533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999124007812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine a number of common verification and benchmark problems for Particle-in-Cell and Direct Simulation Monte Carlo codes. Since results, including convergence rates, comparison to analytic solutions, and code-to-code comparisons, for these problems are often used as evidence of correctness for simulation codes, it is necessary to understand what successful verification using one or more of these problems implies about the correctness of the simulation code. To that end, a series of benchmark problems is performed in Aleph, a PIC-DSMC code developed at Sandia National Laboratories, including both at the canonical numerical parameters and others where verification should fail. The results presented suggest that improvements and extensions to current benchmark problems and additional problem specifications would benefit existing and future codes thereby providing greater confidence in predictive results.
PIC-DSMC 程序的基准验证
我们研究了粒子中单元和直接模拟蒙特卡罗代码的一些常见验证和基准问题。由于这些问题的结果(包括收敛率、与解析解的比较以及代码间的比较)经常被用作仿真代码正确性的证据,因此有必要了解使用一个或多个这些问题的成功验证对仿真代码的正确性意味着什么。为此,我们在桑迪亚国家实验室开发的 PIC-DSMC 代码 Aleph 中执行了一系列基准问题,包括典型数值参数和其他验证应该失败的问题。结果表明,对当前基准问题的改进和扩展以及额外的问题规范将有利于现有和未来的代码,从而为预测结果提供更大的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Physics
Journal of Computational Physics 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
763
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Computational Physics thoroughly treats the computational aspects of physical problems, presenting techniques for the numerical solution of mathematical equations arising in all areas of physics. The journal seeks to emphasize methods that cross disciplinary boundaries. The Journal of Computational Physics also publishes short notes of 4 pages or less (including figures, tables, and references but excluding title pages). Letters to the Editor commenting on articles already published in this Journal will also be considered. Neither notes nor letters should have an abstract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信