Codesign of a Neurological Physiotherapy Student-Led Clinic With Students and Patients: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Donna Wynne, Elizabeth Hancock, Kay Cooper
{"title":"Codesign of a Neurological Physiotherapy Student-Led Clinic With Students and Patients: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.","authors":"Donna Wynne, Elizabeth Hancock, Kay Cooper","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explores students' and patients' views of a UK physical therapy student-led clinic (SLC) for neurological rehabilitation and, using a codesign approach, it proposes an optimal design of a physical therapy SLC for neurological rehabilitation for patient participation and student learning.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>There is a paucity of literature examining experiences of neurological rehabilitation SLCs. Although research supports the utilization of codesign methodologies with patients and for curriculum development, there remains a gap regarding its application to SLCs in physical therapy for individuals with neurological conditions.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Convenience sampling was used to recruit 4 patient and 4 student participants to take part in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed exploratory codesign based on the participatory action research approach. Three online codesign workshops were facilitated by the research team. Thematic analysis of each workshop informed the outline for the next.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients perceived that the SLC improved their overall well-being, and they highly valued being able to access rehabilitation. Students reported that they developed a range of clinical skills through participation in the SLC but would have liked a more in-depth orientation. The codesign process identified 5 key elements for the optimal design of the physical therapy neurological SLC: student support, continuity, supervision, peer-assisted learning, and orientation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggest that the SLC provides both a quality learning experience and a patient service, which is safe, effective, and sustainable. Future research should be undertaken with different stages of students and in different university settings. The codesign approach has been shown to be feasible for students and patients and could be used across other aspects of curriculum design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel study using codesign methodology provides initial findings of key elements to optimize SLCs in neurological physical therapy, to enhance student learning and patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores students' and patients' views of a UK physical therapy student-led clinic (SLC) for neurological rehabilitation and, using a codesign approach, it proposes an optimal design of a physical therapy SLC for neurological rehabilitation for patient participation and student learning.

Review of literature: There is a paucity of literature examining experiences of neurological rehabilitation SLCs. Although research supports the utilization of codesign methodologies with patients and for curriculum development, there remains a gap regarding its application to SLCs in physical therapy for individuals with neurological conditions.

Subjects: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 4 patient and 4 student participants to take part in the study.

Methods: This qualitative study employed exploratory codesign based on the participatory action research approach. Three online codesign workshops were facilitated by the research team. Thematic analysis of each workshop informed the outline for the next.

Results: Patients perceived that the SLC improved their overall well-being, and they highly valued being able to access rehabilitation. Students reported that they developed a range of clinical skills through participation in the SLC but would have liked a more in-depth orientation. The codesign process identified 5 key elements for the optimal design of the physical therapy neurological SLC: student support, continuity, supervision, peer-assisted learning, and orientation.

Discussion: Findings suggest that the SLC provides both a quality learning experience and a patient service, which is safe, effective, and sustainable. Future research should be undertaken with different stages of students and in different university settings. The codesign approach has been shown to be feasible for students and patients and could be used across other aspects of curriculum design.

Conclusion: This novel study using codesign methodology provides initial findings of key elements to optimize SLCs in neurological physical therapy, to enhance student learning and patient experience.

与学生和患者共同设计神经物理治疗学生主导诊所:一项探索性定性研究。
导言:本研究探讨了学生和患者对英国神经康复理疗学生主导诊所(SLC)的看法,并采用编码设计方法,提出了神经康复理疗SLC的最佳设计方案,以促进患者参与和学生学习:研究神经康复 SLC 经验的文献极少。尽管有研究支持在患者和课程开发中使用代码设计方法,但将其应用于针对神经系统疾病患者的物理治疗 SLC 方面仍存在空白:研究采用便利抽样法,招募了 4 名患者和 4 名学生参与研究:这项定性研究采用了基于参与式行动研究方法的探索性编码设计。研究小组主持了三次在线编码设计研讨会。每次研讨会的主题分析都为下一次研讨会提供了参考:结果:患者认为,SLC 改善了他们的整体福祉,他们高度评价能够获得康复服务。学生们表示,通过参加 SLC,他们掌握了一系列临床技能,但希望能有更深入的指导。代码设计过程确定了神经系统理疗SLC优化设计的5个关键要素:学生支持、连续性、监督、同伴辅助学习和指导:讨论:研究结果表明,SLC既能提供高质量的学习体验,又能为患者提供安全、有效和可持续的服务。今后的研究应针对不同阶段的学生,在不同的大学环境中进行。对学生和患者而言,代码设计方法已被证明是可行的,并可用于课程设计的其他方面:这项使用代码设计方法的新颖研究为优化神经物理治疗中的SLC提供了关键要素的初步发现,以提高学生的学习效果和患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信