Radiofrequency treatments for lumbar facet joint syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Soyoon Park, Ji-Hoon Park, Ni Sokpeou, Jae Ni Jang, Young Uk Kim, Young-Soon Choi, Sukhee Park
{"title":"Radiofrequency treatments for lumbar facet joint syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Soyoon Park, Ji-Hoon Park, Ni Sokpeou, Jae Ni Jang, Young Uk Kim, Young-Soon Choi, Sukhee Park","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar facet joint syndrome (FJS) is a common cause of chronic low back pain (LBP). Radiofrequency treatments are commonly used to treat chronic LBP-related FJS that is refractory to conservative treatment, although evidence supporting this treatment is controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency on FJS using a network meta-analysis (NMA).</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared radiofrequency with other treatments (sham procedures, facet joint corticosteroid injection, and conservative treatment) for FJS. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database, and handsearching. The primary outcomes were pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Statistical analysis included conventional pairwise meta-analysis and NMA using the frequentist method.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. The search yielded 25 RCTs (1969 patients) and a mixed quality regarding the risk of bias, with most studies exhibiting a low risk of bias for most domains. Endoscopic neurotomy consistently ranked highest in terms of pain reduction and ODI score improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At 1 and 6 months, endoscopic neurotomy had the highest SUCRA value for pain reduction (0.833 and 0.860, respectively), followed by medial branch thermal radiofrequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This NMA demonstrates that endoscopic neurotomy is the most effective treatment for lumbar FJS, providing superior and sustained pain relief and functional improvement compared with other treatments. Further, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and address the existing limitations.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024524657.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar facet joint syndrome (FJS) is a common cause of chronic low back pain (LBP). Radiofrequency treatments are commonly used to treat chronic LBP-related FJS that is refractory to conservative treatment, although evidence supporting this treatment is controversial.

Objective: We explored the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency on FJS using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Evidence review: A comprehensive systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared radiofrequency with other treatments (sham procedures, facet joint corticosteroid injection, and conservative treatment) for FJS. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database, and handsearching. The primary outcomes were pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Statistical analysis included conventional pairwise meta-analysis and NMA using the frequentist method.

Findings: The treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. The search yielded 25 RCTs (1969 patients) and a mixed quality regarding the risk of bias, with most studies exhibiting a low risk of bias for most domains. Endoscopic neurotomy consistently ranked highest in terms of pain reduction and ODI score improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At 1 and 6 months, endoscopic neurotomy had the highest SUCRA value for pain reduction (0.833 and 0.860, respectively), followed by medial branch thermal radiofrequency.

Conclusions: This NMA demonstrates that endoscopic neurotomy is the most effective treatment for lumbar FJS, providing superior and sustained pain relief and functional improvement compared with other treatments. Further, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and address the existing limitations.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024524657.

治疗腰椎面关节综合征的射频疗法:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:腰椎面关节综合征(FJS)是导致慢性腰背痛(LBP)的常见原因。射频治疗常用于治疗保守治疗无效的慢性腰痛相关 FJS,但支持这种治疗方法的证据尚存争议:我们使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)探讨了射频对 FJS 的治疗效果:我们对多个数据库进行了全面系统的检索,以确定将射频治疗与其他治疗方法(假手术、面关节皮质类固醇注射和保守治疗)进行比较的 FJS 随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 数据库并进行了人工搜索。主要结果为疼痛评分和奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)。统计分析包括传统的配对荟萃分析和使用频数主义方法的NMA:使用累积排序曲线下表面值(SUCRA)对治疗方法进行排序。搜索结果显示有 25 项 RCT(1969 名患者),偏倚风险的质量参差不齐,大多数研究在大多数领域的偏倚风险较低。内窥镜神经切除术在减轻疼痛和改善 1、3、6 和 12 个月的 ODI 评分方面一直名列前茅。在1个月和6个月时,内窥镜神经切除术在减轻疼痛方面的SUCRA值最高(分别为0.833和0.860),其次是内侧支热射频术:该 NMA 表明,内窥镜神经切断术是治疗腰椎 FJS 的最有效方法,与其他治疗方法相比,它能提供更优越、更持久的疼痛缓解和功能改善。还需要更多高质量的 RCT 研究来证实这些发现并解决现有的局限性:CRD42024524657。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信