Automated Real-Time Tool for Promoting Crisis Resource Use for Suicide Risk (ResourceBot): Development and Usability Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.2196/58409
Daniel Dl Coppersmith, Kate H Bentley, Evan M Kleiman, Adam C Jaroszewski, Merryn Daniel, Matthew K Nock
{"title":"Automated Real-Time Tool for Promoting Crisis Resource Use for Suicide Risk (ResourceBot): Development and Usability Study.","authors":"Daniel Dl Coppersmith, Kate H Bentley, Evan M Kleiman, Adam C Jaroszewski, Merryn Daniel, Matthew K Nock","doi":"10.2196/58409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-time monitoring captures information about suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) as they occur and offers great promise to learn about STBs. However, this approach also introduces questions about how to monitor and respond to real-time information about STBs. Given the increasing use of real-time monitoring, there is a need for novel, effective, and scalable tools for responding to suicide risk in real time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to develop and test an automated tool (ResourceBot) that promotes the use of crisis services (eg, 988) in real time through a rule-based (ie, if-then) brief barrier reduction intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ResourceBot was tested in a 2-week real-time monitoring study of 74 adults with recent suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ResourceBot was deployed 221 times to 36 participants. There was high engagement with ResourceBot (ie, 87% of the time ResourceBot was deployed, a participant opened the tool and submitted a response to it), but zero participants reported using crisis services after engaging with ResourceBot. The most reported reasons for not using crisis services were beliefs that the resources would not help, wanting to handle things on one's own, and the resources requiring too much time or effort. At the end of the study, participants rated ResourceBot with good usability (mean of 75.6 out of 100) and satisfaction (mean of 20.8 out of 32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights both the possibilities and challenges of developing effective real-time interventions for suicide risk and areas for refinement in future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e58409"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Real-time monitoring captures information about suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) as they occur and offers great promise to learn about STBs. However, this approach also introduces questions about how to monitor and respond to real-time information about STBs. Given the increasing use of real-time monitoring, there is a need for novel, effective, and scalable tools for responding to suicide risk in real time.

Objective: The goal of this study was to develop and test an automated tool (ResourceBot) that promotes the use of crisis services (eg, 988) in real time through a rule-based (ie, if-then) brief barrier reduction intervention.

Methods: ResourceBot was tested in a 2-week real-time monitoring study of 74 adults with recent suicidal thoughts.

Results: ResourceBot was deployed 221 times to 36 participants. There was high engagement with ResourceBot (ie, 87% of the time ResourceBot was deployed, a participant opened the tool and submitted a response to it), but zero participants reported using crisis services after engaging with ResourceBot. The most reported reasons for not using crisis services were beliefs that the resources would not help, wanting to handle things on one's own, and the resources requiring too much time or effort. At the end of the study, participants rated ResourceBot with good usability (mean of 75.6 out of 100) and satisfaction (mean of 20.8 out of 32).

Conclusions: This study highlights both the possibilities and challenges of developing effective real-time interventions for suicide risk and areas for refinement in future work.

促进自杀风险危机资源使用的自动化实时工具(ResourceBot):开发和可用性研究。
背景:实时监控可以在自杀想法和行为(STBs)发生时捕捉到相关信息,为了解 STBs 提供了巨大的希望。然而,这种方法也带来了如何监测和应对 STB 实时信息的问题。鉴于实时监控的使用越来越多,我们需要新颖、有效和可扩展的工具来实时应对自杀风险:本研究的目标是开发并测试一种自动化工具(ResourceBot),通过基于规则(即 "如果-那么")的简短障碍减少干预措施,实时促进危机服务(如 988)的使用:在对 74 名近期有自杀倾向的成年人进行的为期两周的实时监控研究中,对 ResourceBot 进行了测试:结果:36 名参与者共使用 ResourceBot 221 次。ResourceBot的参与度很高(即在87%的ResourceBot部署次数中,参与者都打开了工具并提交了回复),但没有参与者报告在使用ResourceBot后使用了危机服务。不使用危机服务的最主要原因是认为资源不会提供帮助、希望自己处理事情以及资源需要花费太多时间或精力。研究结束时,参与者对 ResourceBot 的可用性(平均 75.6 分,满分 100 分)和满意度(平均 20.8 分,满分 32 分)进行了评分:本研究强调了针对自杀风险开发有效实时干预措施的可能性和挑战,以及未来工作中需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信