Elliptical excision and primary closure of nasal defect to achieve best esthetic outcome: A case series of 50 patients.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.25259/jcas_120_23
Yogesh M Bhingradia, Chinmai Yadav, Tejaswini Sopanrao Salunke
{"title":"Elliptical excision and primary closure of nasal defect to achieve best esthetic outcome: A case series of 50 patients.","authors":"Yogesh M Bhingradia, Chinmai Yadav, Tejaswini Sopanrao Salunke","doi":"10.25259/jcas_120_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the cosmetic result of nasal of an elliptical excision and primary closure on small nasal defect by using Scar assessment using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective interventional study was conducted in a private clinic over a 2-year duration. Patients aged 18-60 years with nasal defects <1.5 cm were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised status, keloidal tendency, local site infection, bleeding disorder, age <18 years, and lack of consent. Scar assessment using the SBSES was performed at the end of 6 months. Statistical analysis included summary statistics, analysis of variance tests, and a significance level of <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 50 patients, with 54% males and 46% females. The most common age group was 21-40 years, and melanocytic nevi was the most common cause for excision. Lesions were excised mainly from the lateral wall and dorsum of the nose. The mean SBSES score was 3.79 ± 0.467. The best cosmetic outcome was observed in lesions involving the dorsum followed by the root of the nose. No significant difference was found among the SBSES scores for various subunits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elliptical excision with primary closure is a simple and effective technique for small nasal defects, providing good cosmetic results. The location of the nasal defect influences the cosmetic outcome, with better results observed in areas with thinner skin and increased skin laxity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"234-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jcas_120_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the cosmetic result of nasal of an elliptical excision and primary closure on small nasal defect by using Scar assessment using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score.

Material and methods: This retrospective interventional study was conducted in a private clinic over a 2-year duration. Patients aged 18-60 years with nasal defects <1.5 cm were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised status, keloidal tendency, local site infection, bleeding disorder, age <18 years, and lack of consent. Scar assessment using the SBSES was performed at the end of 6 months. Statistical analysis included summary statistics, analysis of variance tests, and a significance level of P < 0.05.

Results: The study included 50 patients, with 54% males and 46% females. The most common age group was 21-40 years, and melanocytic nevi was the most common cause for excision. Lesions were excised mainly from the lateral wall and dorsum of the nose. The mean SBSES score was 3.79 ± 0.467. The best cosmetic outcome was observed in lesions involving the dorsum followed by the root of the nose. No significant difference was found among the SBSES scores for various subunits.

Conclusion: Elliptical excision with primary closure is a simple and effective technique for small nasal defects, providing good cosmetic results. The location of the nasal defect influences the cosmetic outcome, with better results observed in areas with thinner skin and increased skin laxity.

椭圆形切除术和鼻缺损的初次闭合以达到最佳美学效果:50 例患者的病例系列。
目的通过使用石溪瘢痕评估量表(SBSES)进行瘢痕评估,评估鼻部椭圆形切除术和鼻部小缺损一次闭合术的美容效果:这项回顾性干预研究在一家私人诊所进行,为期两年。研究对象为年龄在 18-60 岁之间的鼻腔缺损患者:研究共纳入 50 名患者,其中男性占 54%,女性占 46%。最常见的年龄段为 21-40 岁,黑色素细胞痣是最常见的切除原因。病变主要从鼻侧壁和鼻背切除。平均SBSES评分为(3.79±0.467)分。鼻背病变的美容效果最好,其次是鼻根。不同亚单位的 SBSES 评分无明显差异:结论:椭圆形切除加初次闭合术是治疗鼻部小缺损的一种简单而有效的技术,具有良好的美容效果。鼻部缺损的位置会影响美容效果,皮肤较薄和皮肤松弛度较高的部位效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover aspects of Dermatosurgery and Aesthetic surgery, including cutaneous surgical procedures, lasers, light based treatments and aesthetic treatments. Authors of articles addressing topics such as skin tumours, pigmentary disorders, histopathology, diagnostic techniques, drugs, applications of cosmeceuticals surgical aspects, including pre and post procedural care are highly encouraged to submit with us. The journal also publishes articles on topics in allied specialities suh as plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery vascular surgery, oculoplastic surgery etc. that are relevant to Dermatosurgery. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed Original Research Articles, Systematic reviews, Narrative Reviews, Case reports, Innovations and Debates. Letters to the editor, practice points, pearls in cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, quiz page, images, novel techniques, newer uses of instruments and video presentations and ethical aspects of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery are also invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信