Effect of chloramine T and chlorhexidine in reducing gingivitis in patients admitted to a reference hospital for cardiopulmonary care: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ylana Rosa Matos, Isabelly de Carvalho Leal, Ana Beatriz Alves da Silva, Naiara Ferreira de Oliveira, Islla Ribeiro Pinheiro, Pedryna Maria Oliveira Veras, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Eliane Ferreira Sampaio, Edson Luiz Cetira Filho
{"title":"Effect of chloramine T and chlorhexidine in reducing gingivitis in patients admitted to a reference hospital for cardiopulmonary care: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Ylana Rosa Matos, Isabelly de Carvalho Leal, Ana Beatriz Alves da Silva, Naiara Ferreira de Oliveira, Islla Ribeiro Pinheiro, Pedryna Maria Oliveira Veras, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Eliane Ferreira Sampaio, Edson Luiz Cetira Filho","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06012-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Chloramine T in reducing gingivitis in hospitalized patients, in addition to providing an alternative to the use of Chlorhexidine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, triple-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial was performed with 45 volunteers presenting with gingivitis, using the Löe Gingival Index (LGI). Patients were randomly allocated into one of three groups: (G1): Chloramine T 0.2%; (G2): Chlorhexidine 0.12% and (G3): distilled water.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After five days, the control group (G3) remained without relevant differences in relation to the first pre-treatment assessment, while the groups tested with chlorhexidine and chloramine T showed improvement in the LGI (p < 0.05). After ten days, G3 maintained the results of the previous assessments, G1 repeated the five-day assessment and G2 obtained a statistically significant difference, with a better result in relation to the previous assessment (p < 0.05). After fifteen days, G3 showed no differences in relation to the other assessments, G1 had a statistically significant difference, showing better performance in relation to the previous assessment and G2 continued the gradual improvement it had been showing in the LGI (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chloramine T and Chlorhexidine present similar results in the treatment of gingivitis, when evaluated by probing by the LGI, and Chloramine T can be used effectively, without causing the adverse effects inherent to prolonged use of chlorhexidine.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Importance of oral hygiene for patients admitted to hospitals with the use of adjuvant substances that do not present adverse effects such as chlorhexidine, which is considered the gold standard, seeking to provide better clinical protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06012-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Chloramine T in reducing gingivitis in hospitalized patients, in addition to providing an alternative to the use of Chlorhexidine.

Materials and methods: A randomized, triple-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial was performed with 45 volunteers presenting with gingivitis, using the Löe Gingival Index (LGI). Patients were randomly allocated into one of three groups: (G1): Chloramine T 0.2%; (G2): Chlorhexidine 0.12% and (G3): distilled water.

Results: After five days, the control group (G3) remained without relevant differences in relation to the first pre-treatment assessment, while the groups tested with chlorhexidine and chloramine T showed improvement in the LGI (p < 0.05). After ten days, G3 maintained the results of the previous assessments, G1 repeated the five-day assessment and G2 obtained a statistically significant difference, with a better result in relation to the previous assessment (p < 0.05). After fifteen days, G3 showed no differences in relation to the other assessments, G1 had a statistically significant difference, showing better performance in relation to the previous assessment and G2 continued the gradual improvement it had been showing in the LGI (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Chloramine T and Chlorhexidine present similar results in the treatment of gingivitis, when evaluated by probing by the LGI, and Chloramine T can be used effectively, without causing the adverse effects inherent to prolonged use of chlorhexidine.

Clinical relevance: Importance of oral hygiene for patients admitted to hospitals with the use of adjuvant substances that do not present adverse effects such as chlorhexidine, which is considered the gold standard, seeking to provide better clinical protocols.

氯胺 T 和洗必泰对减轻入住参考医院接受心肺护理的患者牙龈炎的影响:随机对照临床试验。
研究目的本研究旨在评估氯胺 T 在减轻住院病人牙龈炎方面的效果,同时为使用洗必泰提供一种替代方案:对 45 名患有牙龈炎的志愿者进行了一项随机、三盲、安慰剂对照临床试验,采用的是勒氏牙龈指数(LGI)。患者被随机分配到三组中的一组:(G1):氯胺酮 T 0.2%;(G2)结果:五天后,对照组(G3)与治疗前的首次评估结果相比仍无相关差异,而使用洗必泰和氯胺 T 的测试组的 LGI 有所改善(p 结论:氯胺 T 和洗必泰在治疗前的评估结果中没有相关差异:氯胺 T 和洗必泰在治疗牙龈炎时,通过 LGI 探查评估的结果相似,氯胺 T 可以有效使用,而不会产生长期使用洗必泰固有的不良反应:入院患者口腔卫生的重要性,使用洗必泰等不会产生不良影响的辅助物质(被认为是黄金标准),力求提供更好的临床方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信