The Influence of "Labels" for Neck Pain on Recovery Expectations Following a Motor Vehicle Crash: An Online-Randomized Vignette-Based Experiment.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yanfei Xie, Nathalia Costa, Anne Söderlund, Joshua Zadro, Eva-Maj Malmström, Genevieve Grant, Gwendolen Jull, Hans Westergren, Helge Kasch, Joy MacDermid, Julia Treleaven, Michele Curatolo, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn, Tonny Andersen, Trudy Rebbeck, Michele Sterling
{"title":"The Influence of \"Labels\" for Neck Pain on Recovery Expectations Following a Motor Vehicle Crash: An Online-Randomized Vignette-Based Experiment.","authors":"Yanfei Xie, Nathalia Costa, Anne Söderlund, Joshua Zadro, Eva-Maj Malmström, Genevieve Grant, Gwendolen Jull, Hans Westergren, Helge Kasch, Joy MacDermid, Julia Treleaven, Michele Curatolo, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn, Tonny Andersen, Trudy Rebbeck, Michele Sterling","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) investigate whether different labels for neck pain after a motor vehicle crash (MVC) influenced recovery expectations and management beliefs, (2) explore reasons for low recovery expectations and greater likelihood for lodging a claim, and (3) explore the moderating effect of neck pain history and sociodemographic characteristics. <b>DESIGN:</b> Online randomized experiment with nested qualitative content analysis. <b>METHODS:</b> We randomized 2229 participants from the general population (mean age: 46.7 ± 17.5 years; 72.4% females; 66% with previous or current neck pain; 10% with an MVC experience) to read 1 of 5 scenarios describing a patient with neck pain after an MVC, each was labeled as <i>whiplash injury</i>, <i>whiplash-associated disorder</i>, <i>posttraumatic neck pain</i>, <i>neck pain</i>, or <i>neck strain.</i> The primary outcome was recovery expectations, rated on a 0- to 10-point scale. <b>RESULTS:</b> Participants allocated to <i>whiplash-associated disorder</i> or <i>neck pain</i> had lower recovery expectations than those allocated to <i>neck strain</i> (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -0.5 [-0.9 to -0.1] for both comparisons). <i>Whiplash-associated disorder</i> led to more recovery uncertainty, while <i>neck pain</i> led to greater doubt about the health care provider. Most secondary outcomes showed significant but small differences. Participants allocated to <i>neck strain</i> were less inclined to claim than those allocated to <i>whiplash-associated disorder</i> or <i>whiplash injury</i> due to less perceived need for financial support. Neck pain history moderated labeling effects on recovery expectations; household income moderated the claim intention. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Labels for neck pain after an MVC influenced recovery expectations and management preferences. The clinical relevance of the small effects was unclear. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):1-10. Epub 5 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12590</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 11","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To (1) investigate whether different labels for neck pain after a motor vehicle crash (MVC) influenced recovery expectations and management beliefs, (2) explore reasons for low recovery expectations and greater likelihood for lodging a claim, and (3) explore the moderating effect of neck pain history and sociodemographic characteristics. DESIGN: Online randomized experiment with nested qualitative content analysis. METHODS: We randomized 2229 participants from the general population (mean age: 46.7 ± 17.5 years; 72.4% females; 66% with previous or current neck pain; 10% with an MVC experience) to read 1 of 5 scenarios describing a patient with neck pain after an MVC, each was labeled as whiplash injury, whiplash-associated disorder, posttraumatic neck pain, neck pain, or neck strain. The primary outcome was recovery expectations, rated on a 0- to 10-point scale. RESULTS: Participants allocated to whiplash-associated disorder or neck pain had lower recovery expectations than those allocated to neck strain (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -0.5 [-0.9 to -0.1] for both comparisons). Whiplash-associated disorder led to more recovery uncertainty, while neck pain led to greater doubt about the health care provider. Most secondary outcomes showed significant but small differences. Participants allocated to neck strain were less inclined to claim than those allocated to whiplash-associated disorder or whiplash injury due to less perceived need for financial support. Neck pain history moderated labeling effects on recovery expectations; household income moderated the claim intention. CONCLUSIONS: Labels for neck pain after an MVC influenced recovery expectations and management preferences. The clinical relevance of the small effects was unclear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):1-10. Epub 5 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12590.

颈部疼痛的 "标签 "对车祸后康复预期的影响:基于小插图的在线随机实验。
目的目的:(1)研究机动车碰撞(MVC)后颈部疼痛的不同标签是否会影响康复期望和管理信念;(2)探讨康复期望低和更有可能提出索赔的原因;(3)探讨颈部疼痛病史和社会人口特征的调节作用。设计:在线随机实验,嵌套定性内容分析。方法:我们从普通人群中随机抽取了 2229 名参与者(平均年龄:46.7 ± 17.5 岁;72.4% 为女性;66% 曾有或目前有颈部疼痛;10% 曾有过机动车碰撞经历),让他们从描述机动车碰撞后颈部疼痛患者的 5 个情景中选择一个进行阅读,每个情景都被标记为鞭打损伤、鞭打相关障碍、创伤后颈部疼痛、颈部疼痛或颈部劳损。主要结果是康复期望值,按 0-10 分制评分。结果:分配到鞭打相关障碍或颈部疼痛的参与者的康复预期低于分配到颈部劳损的参与者(调整后的平均差异[95%置信区间]:-0.5 [-0.9至-0.1])。颈鞭相关障碍导致更多的康复不确定性,而颈部疼痛则导致更多的人对医疗服务提供者产生怀疑。大多数次要结果显示出显著但微小的差异。与颈部鞭打相关障碍或鞭打损伤的参与者相比,颈部劳损的参与者更不愿意索赔,因为他们认为自己需要的经济支持更少。颈部疼痛史调节了标签对康复预期的影响;家庭收入调节了索赔意向。结论:机动车碰撞后颈部疼痛的标签会影响康复预期和管理偏好。这些微小影响的临床意义尚不明确。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):1-10.doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12590。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信