Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai, Leandro Escaldelai, Denise Pimentel Bergamaschi
{"title":"Usability of the \"Systematic Review Support\" computer system: a methodological study.","authors":"Fernanda Martins Dias Escaldelai, Leandro Escaldelai, Denise Pimentel Bergamaschi","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.7081.4374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>(1) The \"Systematic Review Support\" system has a high degree of perceived usability.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(2) Its use facilitates the exclusion of duplicate references and the selection of studies.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(3) Remote and synchronous usability testing made research possible during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(4) Combining usability techniques made it possible to identify the necessary adjustments.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(5) The method used expanded the test's capacity in a real context of use.</p><p><p>to evaluate the usability of the \"Systematic Review Support\" computer system.</p><p><p>methodological study involving 21 students who evaluated the computer system in a remote and synchronous usability test. Two activities were carried out, containing 21 tasks simulating the initial steps of a review study, proposals for eliminating duplicate references, selecting studies and resolving disagreements between evaluators. At the end, participants answered the System Usability Scale questionnaire. The measures used were: completion rate with assistance (effectiveness) and time to complete the task (efficiency). The data was described in a table using the mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values.</p><p><p>in a total of 21 tasks, the participants had an assisted completion rate of 9% and an average time of 55.1 minutes (the expected time being 60 minutes). The average score provided by the System Usability Scale instrument was 82.4 (considering a score from 0 to 100), median 85; minimum value 35 and maximum 97.5.</p><p><p>the computer system has the effectiveness and efficiency parameters required of a computer review tool. It has a usability score of 82.4 on a scale of 0 to 100 assessed by the System Usability Scale instrument. The version presented incorporates the adjustments identified in the test in use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"32 ","pages":"e4374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7081.4374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: (1) The "Systematic Review Support" system has a high degree of perceived usability.
Background: (2) Its use facilitates the exclusion of duplicate references and the selection of studies.
Background: (3) Remote and synchronous usability testing made research possible during the pandemic.
Background: (4) Combining usability techniques made it possible to identify the necessary adjustments.
Background: (5) The method used expanded the test's capacity in a real context of use.
to evaluate the usability of the "Systematic Review Support" computer system.
methodological study involving 21 students who evaluated the computer system in a remote and synchronous usability test. Two activities were carried out, containing 21 tasks simulating the initial steps of a review study, proposals for eliminating duplicate references, selecting studies and resolving disagreements between evaluators. At the end, participants answered the System Usability Scale questionnaire. The measures used were: completion rate with assistance (effectiveness) and time to complete the task (efficiency). The data was described in a table using the mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values.
in a total of 21 tasks, the participants had an assisted completion rate of 9% and an average time of 55.1 minutes (the expected time being 60 minutes). The average score provided by the System Usability Scale instrument was 82.4 (considering a score from 0 to 100), median 85; minimum value 35 and maximum 97.5.
the computer system has the effectiveness and efficiency parameters required of a computer review tool. It has a usability score of 82.4 on a scale of 0 to 100 assessed by the System Usability Scale instrument. The version presented incorporates the adjustments identified in the test in use.
期刊介绍：
A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral.
Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
