Lability in parent-child warmth and hostility and adolescent externalizing behaviors.

IF 3.1 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Developmental Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1037/dev0001886

Kristine Marceau, Sohee Lee, Muskan Datta, Olivia C Robertson, Daniel S Shaw, Misaki N Natsuaki, Leslie D Leve, Jody M Ganiban, Jenae M Neiderhiser

{"title":"Lability in parent-child warmth and hostility and adolescent externalizing behaviors.","authors":"Kristine Marceau, Sohee Lee, Muskan Datta, Olivia C Robertson, Daniel S Shaw, Misaki N Natsuaki, Leslie D Leve, Jody M Ganiban, Jenae M Neiderhiser","doi":"10.1037/dev0001886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both longer term developmental changes (increases in hostility, decreases in warmth) and lability (year-to-year fluctuations) in parent-child relationship quality across childhood and adolescence have been linked to adolescent externalizing behaviors. Using a prospective longitudinal study of 561 children who were adopted into nonrelative families at birth (57% male, 56% White, 19% multiracial, 13% Black, 11% Hispanic) where parental warmth and hostility reflect environmental influences or child-evoked reactions, we examined associations between parent-child relationship measures and externalizing behaviors at age 11 and across adolescence (i.e., from age 11 to 13-15 years). Because studies considering gene-environment interplay especially in associations between lability and child externalizing behaviors are sparse and parent-child relationship measures support the intergenerational transmission of psychopathology, we also tested whether parent psychopathology of both adoptive parent (AP; environmental intergenerational transmission) and birth parents (genetic intergenerational transmission) moderated these associations in multivariate regression models. Findings generally supported more effects of fathers' than mothers' warmth and hostility. Although there were some linear associations of increased lability with externalizing behaviors, these did not persist in the context of a multivariate model. Associations between both parents' increasing hostility across childhood on age 11 externalizing behaviors and for fathers increasing hostility and decreasing warmth on increases in externalizing behaviors across adolescence more likely reflect a combination of bidirectional evocative and parenting environmental associations than purely parenting environmental transmission. Moderation by parent psychopathology was sparse, and sensitivity tests revealed no differences by child sex. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both longer term developmental changes (increases in hostility, decreases in warmth) and lability (year-to-year fluctuations) in parent-child relationship quality across childhood and adolescence have been linked to adolescent externalizing behaviors. Using a prospective longitudinal study of 561 children who were adopted into nonrelative families at birth (57% male, 56% White, 19% multiracial, 13% Black, 11% Hispanic) where parental warmth and hostility reflect environmental influences or child-evoked reactions, we examined associations between parent-child relationship measures and externalizing behaviors at age 11 and across adolescence (i.e., from age 11 to 13-15 years). Because studies considering gene-environment interplay especially in associations between lability and child externalizing behaviors are sparse and parent-child relationship measures support the intergenerational transmission of psychopathology, we also tested whether parent psychopathology of both adoptive parent (AP; environmental intergenerational transmission) and birth parents (genetic intergenerational transmission) moderated these associations in multivariate regression models. Findings generally supported more effects of fathers' than mothers' warmth and hostility. Although there were some linear associations of increased lability with externalizing behaviors, these did not persist in the context of a multivariate model. Associations between both parents' increasing hostility across childhood on age 11 externalizing behaviors and for fathers increasing hostility and decreasing warmth on increases in externalizing behaviors across adolescence more likely reflect a combination of bidirectional evocative and parenting environmental associations than purely parenting environmental transmission. Moderation by parent psychopathology was sparse, and sensitivity tests revealed no differences by child sex. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文本刊更多论文

亲子温情和敌意的不稳定性与青少年的外化行为。

儿童期和青春期亲子关系质量的长期发展变化（敌意增加、温暖减少）和不稳定性（逐年波动）都与青少年的外化行为有关。我们对出生时被收养到非亲属家庭的 561 名儿童（57% 为男性，56% 为白人，19% 为多种族，13% 为黑人，11% 为西班牙裔）进行了前瞻性纵向研究，其中父母的温暖和敌意反映了环境影响或儿童诱发的反应。由于考虑到基因-环境相互作用（尤其是在易感性与儿童外部化行为之间的关联方面）的研究很少，而亲子关系测量又支持精神病理学的代际传递，因此我们还在多元回归模型中检验了养父母（AP；环境代际传递）和亲生父母（遗传代际传递）的父母精神病理学是否会调节这些关联。研究结果普遍认为，父亲的温暖和敌意比母亲的影响更大。虽然易变性的增加与外化行为有一些线性关系，但这些关系在多元模型中并不存在。父母双方在童年时期的敌意增加与 11 岁时的外化行为之间的关联，以及父亲敌意增加和温暖减少与青少年时期外化行为增加之间的关联，更有可能反映了双向诱发和养育环境关联的结合，而不是纯粹的养育环境传递。父母心理病理学的调节作用并不明显，敏感性测试显示，儿童性别之间没有差异（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

2.50%

发文量

329

期刊介绍： Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.