Case studies on the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations in Dutch healthcare: a within and cross-case analysis.

IF 1 Q2 LAW
Linda J Knap, Johan Legemaate, Roland D Friele
{"title":"Case studies on the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations in Dutch healthcare: a within and cross-case analysis.","authors":"Linda J Knap, Johan Legemaate, Roland D Friele","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2411480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, ex-post legislative evaluations are becoming increasingly important for understanding how laws function in practice and identifying their limitations and their effects upon stakeholders. This study delves into the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations within the Dutch healthcare system. Building upon insights from previous literature, we aim to refine existing ideas within the field through empirical data. Utilising the realist evaluation method, we examine three distinct case studies followed by a cross-case analysis. Our research underscores that the impact of these evaluations extends beyond policy and politics to the broader societal arena. Our findings also point towards opportunities for strengthening the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations within this broader societal arena. Specifically, we identify strategic phases within the evaluation process through which we aim to maximise impact. Finally, the study emphasises the importance of context awareness, the strategic utilisation of research quality as well as interactional factors for enhancing impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":46487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legislative Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legislative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2024.2411480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, ex-post legislative evaluations are becoming increasingly important for understanding how laws function in practice and identifying their limitations and their effects upon stakeholders. This study delves into the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations within the Dutch healthcare system. Building upon insights from previous literature, we aim to refine existing ideas within the field through empirical data. Utilising the realist evaluation method, we examine three distinct case studies followed by a cross-case analysis. Our research underscores that the impact of these evaluations extends beyond policy and politics to the broader societal arena. Our findings also point towards opportunities for strengthening the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations within this broader societal arena. Specifically, we identify strategic phases within the evaluation process through which we aim to maximise impact. Finally, the study emphasises the importance of context awareness, the strategic utilisation of research quality as well as interactional factors for enhancing impact.

荷兰医疗保健领域事后立法评估影响的案例研究:案例内部和交叉分析。
在全球范围内,事后立法评估对于了解法律如何在实践中发挥作用、确定其局限性及其对利益相关者的影响正变得越来越重要。本研究深入探讨了事后立法评估在荷兰医疗保健系统中的影响。基于以往文献中的见解,我们旨在通过实证数据完善该领域的现有观点。利用现实主义评估方法,我们研究了三个不同的案例,然后进行了交叉分析。我们的研究强调,这些评估的影响超出了政策和政治范围,延伸到了更广泛的社会领域。我们的研究结果还指出了在更广泛的社会领域内加强事后立法评估影响的机会。具体而言,我们确定了评估过程中的战略阶段,旨在通过这些阶段最大限度地扩大影响。最后,本研究强调了背景意识、研究质量的战略性利用以及互动因素对于增强影响力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信