Comparison of the Characteristics of Circulating Small Extracellular Vesicles Isolated by Ultracentrifugation and a Commercial Kit.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reza Afrisham, Vida Farrokhi, Roya Moradi, Shaban Alizadeh
{"title":"Comparison of the Characteristics of Circulating Small Extracellular Vesicles Isolated by Ultracentrifugation and a Commercial Kit.","authors":"Reza Afrisham, Vida Farrokhi, Roya Moradi, Shaban Alizadeh","doi":"10.2174/0118722083325164241015103217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The market offers a wide range of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolation products, but their lack of standardization is a concern. Therefore, it is important to carefully assess the quality of the EVs obtained using these products. In this study, we compared the EXOCIB kit with the ultracentrifuge method, which is considered the gold standard for small EV isolation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After overnight fasting, small plasma EVs were extracted from four individuals using both the ultracentrifuge and the EXOCIB kit methods. The pooled EVs were then compared for the presence of the cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63) protein using the western blot analysis, and their size and zeta potential were performed by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). In addition, the size and morphology of small EVs were determined by using the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average hydrodynamic size of 135.7 nm and a zeta potential of -6.33 Mv at 25°C was found for small EVs isolated by the ultracentrifuge, whereas the kit method resulted in small EVs with a hydrodynamic size of 102.8 nm and a zeta potential of -0.907. Notably, the size of the particles in the kit samples was smaller compared to those obtained through the ultracentrifuge (P < 0.001). The western blot method confirmed the expression of CD63 in both methods, so the ultracentrifuge yielded small EVs with a higher level of purity compared to the kit-based approach (P = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DLS findings revealed the existence of vesicles within the appropriate size range for small EVs like exosomes in both isolation techniques. The results of the western blot analysis, in conjunction with DLS, displayed that the ultracentrifuge method extracted small EVs with a greater degree of purity than the kit-based approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":21064,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722083325164241015103217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The market offers a wide range of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolation products, but their lack of standardization is a concern. Therefore, it is important to carefully assess the quality of the EVs obtained using these products. In this study, we compared the EXOCIB kit with the ultracentrifuge method, which is considered the gold standard for small EV isolation.

Methods: After overnight fasting, small plasma EVs were extracted from four individuals using both the ultracentrifuge and the EXOCIB kit methods. The pooled EVs were then compared for the presence of the cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63) protein using the western blot analysis, and their size and zeta potential were performed by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). In addition, the size and morphology of small EVs were determined by using the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) technique.

Results: An average hydrodynamic size of 135.7 nm and a zeta potential of -6.33 Mv at 25°C was found for small EVs isolated by the ultracentrifuge, whereas the kit method resulted in small EVs with a hydrodynamic size of 102.8 nm and a zeta potential of -0.907. Notably, the size of the particles in the kit samples was smaller compared to those obtained through the ultracentrifuge (P < 0.001). The western blot method confirmed the expression of CD63 in both methods, so the ultracentrifuge yielded small EVs with a higher level of purity compared to the kit-based approach (P = 0.036).

Conclusion: The DLS findings revealed the existence of vesicles within the appropriate size range for small EVs like exosomes in both isolation techniques. The results of the western blot analysis, in conjunction with DLS, displayed that the ultracentrifuge method extracted small EVs with a greater degree of purity than the kit-based approach.

比较超速离心法和商用试剂盒分离的循环小细胞外囊泡的特征
简介:市场上有各种各样的细胞外囊泡 (EVs) 分离产品,但它们缺乏标准化令人担忧。因此,仔细评估使用这些产品获得的 EVs 的质量非常重要。在本研究中,我们将 EXOCIB 试剂盒与超速离心法进行了比较,后者被认为是分离小体积 EV 的金标准:过夜禁食后,使用超速离心机和 EXOCIB 试剂盒两种方法从四个人的血浆中提取小的 EVs。方法:在一夜禁食后,使用超速离心机和 EXOCIB 试剂盒两种方法从四个人的血浆中提取小的 EVs,然后使用 Western 印迹分析比较汇集的 EVs 是否含有分化簇 63(CD63)蛋白,并使用动态光散射(DLS)分析其大小和 zeta 电位。此外,还利用透射电子显微镜(TEM)技术测定了小型 EVs 的大小和形态:结果:通过超速离心机分离出的小型 EVs 的平均流体力学尺寸为 135.7 nm,25°C 时的 zeta 电位为 -6.33 Mv,而试剂盒法分离出的小型 EVs 的流体力学尺寸为 102.8 nm,zeta 电位为 -0.907。值得注意的是,与超速离心机相比,试剂盒样品中的颗粒尺寸更小(P < 0.001)。Western 印迹法确认了两种方法中 CD63 的表达,因此与试剂盒法相比,超速离心法得到的小 EV 的纯度更高(P = 0.036):结论:DLS 研究结果表明,两种分离技术都能分离出适当大小范围内的囊泡,如外泌体等小型 EV。结合 DLS 进行的 Western 印迹分析结果表明,超速离心法提取的小型 EV 的纯度高于试剂盒法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recent patents on biotechnology
Recent patents on biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Recent Patents on Biotechnology publishes review articles by experts on recent patents on biotechnology. A selection of important and recent patents on biotechnology is also included in the journal. The journal is essential reading for all researchers involved in all fields of biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信