Efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block vs. local anesthetic infiltration in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing midline laparotomy: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Merve Bulun Yediyildiz, Hülya Yilmaz Ak, İrem Durmuş, Kübra Taşkin, Esra Keles, Banu Çevik, Murat Api
{"title":"Efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block vs. local anesthetic infiltration in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing midline laparotomy: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Merve Bulun Yediyildiz, Hülya Yilmaz Ak, İrem Durmuş, Kübra Taşkin, Esra Keles, Banu Çevik, Murat Api","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18302-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain is a serious problem in gynecological oncology patients. Rectus sheath block (RSB) is increasingly utilized as a part of multimodal analgesia. The purpose of this three blinded, randomized-controlled trial is to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) bilateral rectus sheath block (BRSB) and local anesthetic wound infiltration (LAWI) application in patients undergoing midline laparotomy for gynecologic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center, three-blinded, randomized clinical trial enrolled a total of 60 patients who underwent surgery through a midline laparotomy. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups and were administered either LAWI or BRSB with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine just after the end of surgery. Both groups were compared for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, time to first analgesic requirement, total tramadol consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients (BRSB=28, LAWI=27) completed the study. The BRSB group had significantly lower NRS scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24th hours (P<0.001). The median (interquartile range, IQR) NRS scores for BRSB group were 3 (3-3) at 2nd hours, 3 (2-4) at 6th hours, 3 (2-4) at 12th hours and 3 (2-3) at 24th hours. For the LAWI group, the median (IQR) NRS scores were 4 (3-4) at 2nd hours, 4 (3-5) at 6th hours, 4 (3-4) at 12th hours and 4 (3-4) at 24th hours. The BRSB group had significantly less additional tramadol consumption than the LAWI group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The US-guided BRSB is a safe and feasible technique. This technique resulted in reduced postoperative pain scores, decreased tramadol usage, and prolonged pain relief compared to LAWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18302-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain is a serious problem in gynecological oncology patients. Rectus sheath block (RSB) is increasingly utilized as a part of multimodal analgesia. The purpose of this three blinded, randomized-controlled trial is to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) bilateral rectus sheath block (BRSB) and local anesthetic wound infiltration (LAWI) application in patients undergoing midline laparotomy for gynecologic cancer.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, three-blinded, randomized clinical trial enrolled a total of 60 patients who underwent surgery through a midline laparotomy. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups and were administered either LAWI or BRSB with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine just after the end of surgery. Both groups were compared for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, time to first analgesic requirement, total tramadol consumption.

Results: Fifty-five patients (BRSB=28, LAWI=27) completed the study. The BRSB group had significantly lower NRS scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24th hours (P<0.001). The median (interquartile range, IQR) NRS scores for BRSB group were 3 (3-3) at 2nd hours, 3 (2-4) at 6th hours, 3 (2-4) at 12th hours and 3 (2-3) at 24th hours. For the LAWI group, the median (IQR) NRS scores were 4 (3-4) at 2nd hours, 4 (3-5) at 6th hours, 4 (3-4) at 12th hours and 4 (3-4) at 24th hours. The BRSB group had significantly less additional tramadol consumption than the LAWI group (P<0.001).

Conclusions: The US-guided BRSB is a safe and feasible technique. This technique resulted in reduced postoperative pain scores, decreased tramadol usage, and prolonged pain relief compared to LAWI.

对接受中线开腹手术的妇科肿瘤患者进行超声引导下双侧直肠鞘阻滞与局麻药浸润的疗效对比:三重盲法随机对照试验。
背景:妇科肿瘤患者术后疼痛是一个严重的问题。直肠鞘阻滞(RSB)越来越多地被用作多模式镇痛的一部分。这项三盲随机对照试验的目的是比较超声引导(US-guided)双侧直肌鞘阻滞(BRSB)和局麻药伤口浸润(LAWI)在妇科癌症中线开腹手术患者中的镇痛效果:这项前瞻性、单中心、三盲、随机临床试验共招募了 60 名接受中线开腹手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组,在手术结束后分别使用 LAWI 或 BRSB,并注射 20 mL 0.25% 布比卡因。两组患者的疼痛评分、首次镇痛需求时间和曲马多总用量进行了比较:55名患者(BRSB=28人,LAWI=27人)完成了研究。BRSB组在2小时、6小时、12小时和24小时的NRS评分明显较低:US 引导下的 BRSB 是一种安全可行的技术。与 LAWI 相比,该技术可降低术后疼痛评分,减少曲马多用量,延长疼痛缓解时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信