Three-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Study of Japanese-Style Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tomoko Kuwata, Hiromi Kashihara, Chikako Kato, Masami Takeyama, Akane Yamaguchi, Youji Moriyama, Chie Nakai, Kosei Miwa, Hidemori Araki, Masahiro Narushima, Mari Yamasaki, Hiromi Hirama, Homare Okazoe
{"title":"Three-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Study of Japanese-Style Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Tomoko Kuwata, Hiromi Kashihara, Chikako Kato, Masami Takeyama, Akane Yamaguchi, Youji Moriyama, Chie Nakai, Kosei Miwa, Hidemori Araki, Masahiro Narushima, Mari Yamasaki, Hiromi Hirama, Homare Okazoe","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05954-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy(LSC) is widely performed and has been reported to safe and effective. However, statistical data on this technique are unavailable. Therefore, we designed the Japanese-style LSC, a further evolution of the French-style LSC, and initiated this multicenter study to prospectively evaluate its efficacy and safety. If the Japanese-style LSC is successful, we may be able to propose a more reliable and standardized procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective study of Japanese-style LSC. The Japanese-style LSC is characterized by the dissection of the vaginal walls as distally as possible and fixation of the mesh with multiple sutures; fixation of the mesh on the promontory without traction; and closure of the peritoneum with high-level peritoneal sutures. We examined the primary (anatomical recurrence, adverse events, and quality of life) and secondary endpoints (voiding symptoms and sexual function) at 3 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In anatomical recurrence, 24 patients (9.2%) were ≥ stage2 in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system at 3 years postoperatively, of which 4 (1.5%) and 20 (7.7%) were stages III and II respectively. No mesh-related complications were observed, and each questionnaire showed predominant improvement, except for sexual and evacuation functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Japanese-style LSC demonstrated superior anatomical and functional results and we propose it to be an effective procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05954-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy(LSC) is widely performed and has been reported to safe and effective. However, statistical data on this technique are unavailable. Therefore, we designed the Japanese-style LSC, a further evolution of the French-style LSC, and initiated this multicenter study to prospectively evaluate its efficacy and safety. If the Japanese-style LSC is successful, we may be able to propose a more reliable and standardized procedure.

Methods: This is a prospective study of Japanese-style LSC. The Japanese-style LSC is characterized by the dissection of the vaginal walls as distally as possible and fixation of the mesh with multiple sutures; fixation of the mesh on the promontory without traction; and closure of the peritoneum with high-level peritoneal sutures. We examined the primary (anatomical recurrence, adverse events, and quality of life) and secondary endpoints (voiding symptoms and sexual function) at 3 years postoperatively.

Results: In anatomical recurrence, 24 patients (9.2%) were ≥ stage2 in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system at 3 years postoperatively, of which 4 (1.5%) and 20 (7.7%) were stages III and II respectively. No mesh-related complications were observed, and each questionnaire showed predominant improvement, except for sexual and evacuation functions.

Conclusions: The Japanese-style LSC demonstrated superior anatomical and functional results and we propose it to be an effective procedure.

日本式腹腔镜骶骨整形术多中心研究的三年结果
引言和假设:腹腔镜骶尾部结肠切除术(LSC)被广泛采用,并被报道为安全有效。然而,有关这项技术的统计数据尚缺。因此,我们设计了日式 LSC,它是法式 LSC 的进一步发展,并启动了这项多中心研究,以前瞻性地评估其有效性和安全性。如果日式 LSC 成功,我们或许能提出一种更可靠、更标准化的手术方法:这是一项关于日式 LSC 的前瞻性研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究。日式 LSC 的特点是尽可能向远端剥离阴道壁,并用多针缝合固定网片;在不牵引的情况下将网片固定在突出部;用高位腹膜缝合线缝合腹膜。我们检查了术后3年的主要终点(解剖复发、不良事件和生活质量)和次要终点(排尿症状和性功能):在解剖复发方面,术后 3 年有 24 名患者(9.2%)在盆腔器官脱垂定量系统中≥2 期,其中 4 名(1.5%)和 20 名(7.7%)分别为 III 期和 II 期。除性功能和排空功能外,每项问卷调查均显示有明显改善:结论:日式 LSC 在解剖学和功能上都有很好的效果,我们认为这是一种有效的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信