An In Vitro Exploration of Interaction Mechanisms of Intracoronal Bleaching on the Compressive Strength of Conventional and Calcium Silicate-Based Self-Adhesive Resins and Their Bonding to Composite Resin Restorative Material.

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6645237
Fereshteh Shafiei, Paria Dehghanian, Shadi Tivay, Yasamin Ghahramani
{"title":"An In Vitro Exploration of Interaction Mechanisms of Intracoronal Bleaching on the Compressive Strength of Conventional and Calcium Silicate-Based Self-Adhesive Resins and Their Bonding to Composite Resin Restorative Material.","authors":"Fereshteh Shafiei, Paria Dehghanian, Shadi Tivay, Yasamin Ghahramani","doi":"10.1155/2024/6645237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The cervical resorption following intracoronal bleaching necessitates the application of impermeable cervical barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two bleaching agents on the compressive strength (CS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of two self-adhesive resins, TheraCem and Vertise Flow, to composite resin restorative material. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Two hundred sixteen specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow were prepared in special molds and treated in three groups: nonbleached (control); sodium perborate-hydrogen peroxide (SP-HP) (sodium perborate +3% hydrogen peroxide); and HP gel (35% hydrogen peroxide gel). The CS of 72 specimens in the three groups was tested using a universal testing machine. For SBS test, 144 specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow in the three groups were bonded to Z250 composite using Single Bond Universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes. SBS was measured using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for CS and three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for SBS. <b>Results:</b> Vertise Flow showed higher CS than TheraCem (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while none of the bleaching agents deteriorated its CS. HP gel significantly lowered the CS of TheraCem (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Bleaching agents increased the SBS of Vertise Flow while the SBS of TheraCem was not significantly affected. For both resin barriers, SBS was higher in the etch-and-rinse mode (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except in nonbleached Vertise Flow (<i>p</i> = 0.091). <b>Conclusions:</b> HP gel deleteriously affected the CS of only TheraCem during nonvital bleaching. The etch-and-rinse mode was preferred in terms of SBS for resin barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6645237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6645237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The cervical resorption following intracoronal bleaching necessitates the application of impermeable cervical barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two bleaching agents on the compressive strength (CS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of two self-adhesive resins, TheraCem and Vertise Flow, to composite resin restorative material. Materials and Methods: Two hundred sixteen specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow were prepared in special molds and treated in three groups: nonbleached (control); sodium perborate-hydrogen peroxide (SP-HP) (sodium perborate +3% hydrogen peroxide); and HP gel (35% hydrogen peroxide gel). The CS of 72 specimens in the three groups was tested using a universal testing machine. For SBS test, 144 specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow in the three groups were bonded to Z250 composite using Single Bond Universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes. SBS was measured using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for CS and three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for SBS. Results: Vertise Flow showed higher CS than TheraCem (p < 0.001), while none of the bleaching agents deteriorated its CS. HP gel significantly lowered the CS of TheraCem (p = 0.001). Bleaching agents increased the SBS of Vertise Flow while the SBS of TheraCem was not significantly affected. For both resin barriers, SBS was higher in the etch-and-rinse mode (p < 0.05), except in nonbleached Vertise Flow (p = 0.091). Conclusions: HP gel deleteriously affected the CS of only TheraCem during nonvital bleaching. The etch-and-rinse mode was preferred in terms of SBS for resin barriers.

冠状沟内漂白对传统和硅酸钙基自粘树脂的抗压强度及其与复合树脂修复材料粘接的相互作用机制的体外探究
目的:冠状沟内漂白后的宫颈吸收需要使用不透水的宫颈屏障。本研究旨在评估两种漂白剂对两种自粘树脂(TheraCem 和 Vertise Flow)与复合树脂修复材料的抗压强度(CS)和剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。材料和方法:用特殊模具制备了 216 个 TheraCem 和 Vertise Flow 试样,并将其分为三组进行处理:未漂白(对照组);过硼酸钠-过氧化氢(SP-HP)(过硼酸钠 +3% 过氧化氢);HP 凝胶(35% 过氧化氢凝胶)。使用万能试验机对三组 72 个试样的 CS 进行了测试。在 SBS 测试中,使用单粘结通用粘合剂以自刻蚀和蚀刻-冲洗模式将三组中 TheraCem 和 Vertise Flow 的 144 个试样粘结到 Z250 复合材料上。使用万能试验机测量 SBS。对 CS 采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行数据分析,对 SBS 采用三向方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行数据分析。结果显示Vertise Flow 的 CS 值高于 TheraCem(p < 0.001),而所有漂白剂都不会降低其 CS 值。HP 凝胶明显降低了 TheraCem 的 CS(p = 0.001)。漂白剂增加了 Vertise Flow 的 SBS,而 TheraCem 的 SBS 没有受到明显影响。对于这两种树脂屏障,除了未漂白的 Vertise Flow(p = 0.091)外,在蚀刻-冲洗模式下 SBS 都更高(p < 0.05)。结论:在非重要漂白过程中,HP 凝胶只对 TheraCem 的 CS 有有害影响。就树脂屏障的 SBS 而言,蚀刻-冲洗模式更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信