Effect of fenofibrate on residual beta cell function in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pernille E Hostrup, Tobias Schmidt, Simon B Hellsten, Rebekka H Gerwig, Joachim Størling, Jesper Johannesen, Karolina Sulek, Morten Hostrup, Henrik U Andersen, Karsten Buschard, Yasmin Hamid, Flemming Pociot
{"title":"Effect of fenofibrate on residual beta cell function in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Pernille E Hostrup, Tobias Schmidt, Simon B Hellsten, Rebekka H Gerwig, Joachim Størling, Jesper Johannesen, Karolina Sulek, Morten Hostrup, Henrik U Andersen, Karsten Buschard, Yasmin Hamid, Flemming Pociot","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06290-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, shows some promise in alleviating beta cell stress and preserving beta cell function in preclinical studies of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 58 individuals (aged 16 to 40 years old) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and randomised them to daily oral treatment with fenofibrate 160 mg or placebo for 52 weeks (in a block design with a block size of 4, assigned in a 1:1 ratio). Our primary outcome was change in beta cell function after 52 weeks of treatment, assessed by AUC for C-peptide levels following a 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control (assessed by HbA<sub>1c</sub> and continuous glucose monitoring), daily insulin use, and proinsulin/C-peptide (PI/C) ratio as a marker of beta cell stress. We assessed outcome measures before and after 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. Blinding was maintained for participants, their healthcare providers and all staff involved in handling outcome samples and assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analyses for the primary outcome included 56 participants (n=27 in the fenofibrate group, after two withdrawals, and n=29 in the placebo group). We found no significant differences between the groups in either 2 h C-peptide levels (mean difference of 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23]), insulin use or glycaemic control after 52 weeks of treatment. On the contrary, the fenofibrate group showed a higher PI/C ratio at week 52 compared with placebo (mean difference of 0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p<0.05). Blood lipidome analysis revealed that fenofibrate repressed pathways involved in sphingolipid metabolism and signalling at week 52 compared with placebo. The 52 week intervention evoked few adverse events and no serious adverse events. Follow-up in vitro experiments in human pancreatic islets demonstrated a stress-inducing effect of fenofibrate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>Contrary to the beneficial effects of fenofibrate found in preclinical studies, this longitudinal, randomised, placebo-controlled trial does not support the use of fenofibrate for preserving beta cell function in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING: This study was funded by the Sehested Hansens Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06290-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist, shows some promise in alleviating beta cell stress and preserving beta cell function in preclinical studies of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

Methods: We enrolled 58 individuals (aged 16 to 40 years old) with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and randomised them to daily oral treatment with fenofibrate 160 mg or placebo for 52 weeks (in a block design with a block size of 4, assigned in a 1:1 ratio). Our primary outcome was change in beta cell function after 52 weeks of treatment, assessed by AUC for C-peptide levels following a 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control (assessed by HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring), daily insulin use, and proinsulin/C-peptide (PI/C) ratio as a marker of beta cell stress. We assessed outcome measures before and after 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. Blinding was maintained for participants, their healthcare providers and all staff involved in handling outcome samples and assessment.

Results: The statistical analyses for the primary outcome included 56 participants (n=27 in the fenofibrate group, after two withdrawals, and n=29 in the placebo group). We found no significant differences between the groups in either 2 h C-peptide levels (mean difference of 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23]), insulin use or glycaemic control after 52 weeks of treatment. On the contrary, the fenofibrate group showed a higher PI/C ratio at week 52 compared with placebo (mean difference of 0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p<0.05). Blood lipidome analysis revealed that fenofibrate repressed pathways involved in sphingolipid metabolism and signalling at week 52 compared with placebo. The 52 week intervention evoked few adverse events and no serious adverse events. Follow-up in vitro experiments in human pancreatic islets demonstrated a stress-inducing effect of fenofibrate.

Conclusions/interpretation: Contrary to the beneficial effects of fenofibrate found in preclinical studies, this longitudinal, randomised, placebo-controlled trial does not support the use of fenofibrate for preserving beta cell function in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

Trial registration: EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING: This study was funded by the Sehested Hansens Foundation.

Abstract Image

非诺贝特对新确诊 1 型糖尿病成人和青少年残余β细胞功能的影响:随机临床试验。
目的/假设:非诺贝特是一种过氧化物酶体增殖激活受体α激动剂,在1型糖尿病的临床前研究中,非诺贝特在缓解β细胞压力和保护β细胞功能方面显示出一定的前景。这项 2 期安慰剂对照双盲随机临床试验旨在研究非诺贝特对新诊断为 1 型糖尿病的成人和青少年患者的疗效和安全性:我们招募了58名新确诊的1型糖尿病患者(年龄在16至40岁之间),并随机安排他们每天口服非诺贝特160毫克或安慰剂,疗程为52周(按1:1的比例分配,每组4人)。我们的主要研究结果是治疗52周后β细胞功能的变化,通过2小时混合餐耐受试验后C肽水平的AUC进行评估。次要结果包括血糖控制(通过 HbA1c 和连续血糖监测评估)、每日胰岛素用量以及作为β细胞应激标志物的胰岛素/C肽(PI/C)比率。我们对治疗前后 4 周、12 周、26 周和 52 周的结果进行了评估。对参与者、他们的医疗服务提供者以及所有参与处理结果样本和评估的工作人员都进行了盲法处理:主要结果的统计分析包括56名参与者(非诺贝特组27人,其中2人退出;安慰剂组29人)。我们发现,治疗 52 周后,两组之间在 2 h C 肽水平(平均差异为 0.08 nmol/l [95% CI -0.05, 0.23])、胰岛素使用或血糖控制方面均无明显差异。相反,与安慰剂相比,非诺贝特组在第52周的PI/C比值更高(平均差异为0.024 [95% CI 0.000, 0.048], p结论/解释:与临床前研究中发现的非诺贝特的有益作用相反,这项纵向、随机、安慰剂对照试验并不支持使用非诺贝特来保护新诊断的1型糖尿病患者的β细胞功能:EudraCT number: 2019-004434-41 FUNDING:本研究由Sehested Hansens基金会资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信