Cancer Risks in Attenuated and Classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Cohort with Matched, Non-Exposed Individuals: Cancer and surgery in AFAP and FAP patients.
Søren Hammershøj Beck, John Gásdal Karstensen, Steffen Bülow, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Helle Højen, Niels Jespersen, Tine Plato Kuhlmann, Hans Christian Pommergaard, Mads Damgaard Wewer, Laus Wullum, Anne Marie Jelsig, Johan Burisch
{"title":"Cancer Risks in Attenuated and Classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Cohort with Matched, Non-Exposed Individuals: Cancer and surgery in AFAP and FAP patients.","authors":"Søren Hammershøj Beck, John Gásdal Karstensen, Steffen Bülow, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Helle Højen, Niels Jespersen, Tine Plato Kuhlmann, Hans Christian Pommergaard, Mads Damgaard Wewer, Laus Wullum, Anne Marie Jelsig, Johan Burisch","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in CFAP and AFAP patients compared to matched, non-exposed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All known Danish FAP patients were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned four matched, non-exposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 311 CFAP patients, 134 AFAP patients, and 1,600 non-exposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both CFAP and AFAP patients than for non-exposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HR) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.61-6.32; P<0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P<0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P=0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P=0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P=0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively compared to non-exposed and did not differ between CFAP and AFAP patients (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P=0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR=2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P<0.001), but not in AFAP (HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P=0.311).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared to non-exposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by pathogenic variants in the APC gene. FAP is usually categorized according to phenotype: classical FAP (CFAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP); the latter is considered to have a milder disease course. We aimed to assess the risk of overall and specific cancers in CFAP and AFAP patients compared to matched, non-exposed individuals.
Methods: All known Danish FAP patients were classified as either CFAP or AFAP and assigned four matched, non-exposed individuals. The risk of overall and specific cancers, and mortality were analyzed.
Results: The analysis included 311 CFAP patients, 134 AFAP patients, and 1,600 non-exposed individuals. The overall cancer risk was significantly higher for both CFAP and AFAP patients than for non-exposed individuals, with hazard ratios (HR) of 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.61-6.32; P<0.001) for CFAP and 3.22 (95% CI, 2.16-4.80; P<0.001) for AFAP. No significant difference was observed when comparing CFAP and AFAP (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 0.98-2.25; P=0.0646). The HR of colonic cancer was 2.16 (95% CI, 0.99-7.72; P=0.0522) and 2.72 (95% CI, 1.19-6.22; P=0.0177 for CFAP and AFAP), respectively compared to non-exposed and did not differ between CFAP and AFAP patients (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-2.00; P=0.6278). Mortality was significantly higher in CFAP (HR=2.96; 95% CI, 2.04-4.28; P<0.001), but not in AFAP (HR=1.40; 95% CI, 0.73-2.69; P=0.311).
Conclusion: Nationwide data reveal differing risk profiles for specific cancers and mortality in AFAP and CFAP compared to non-exposed individuals. The cancer burden of AFAP necessitates consistent monitoring of these patients.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.