Impact of local tobacco control policies on the prevalence of smoke-free sports clubs

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Heike H. Garritsen , Andrea D. Rozema , Rixt A. Smit , Ien AM. van de Goor , Mara van Dooremaal , Jessica Baars , Anton E. Kunst
{"title":"Impact of local tobacco control policies on the prevalence of smoke-free sports clubs","authors":"Heike H. Garritsen ,&nbsp;Andrea D. Rozema ,&nbsp;Rixt A. Smit ,&nbsp;Ien AM. van de Goor ,&nbsp;Mara van Dooremaal ,&nbsp;Jessica Baars ,&nbsp;Anton E. Kunst","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In absence of national legislation, local governments may stimulate outdoor sports clubs to become smoke-free. However, it is unknown whether and to what extent such efforts are effective in encouraging sports clubs to adopt a smoke-free policy (SFP). The aim of this study was to assess the association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Retrospective, cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Information on Dutch sports clubs (N = 3068) was linked to information on tobacco control policies of municipalities (i.e., “smoking prevention policies”, “smoke-free environment policies”, and “smoke-free sports policies”) (N = 218). Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between municipal tobacco control policies and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs, while controlling for sports clubs’ characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found a positive, dose-response association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. The odds of having an SFP in place was significantly higher for sports clubs in municipalities with moderate “smoking prevention policies” (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.18–2.89), strong “smoke-free environment policies” (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.19–3.20), and strong “smoke-free sports policies” (OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.02–2.24) compared to sports clubs in municipalities with no/weak policies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggest that local tobacco control policies can increase the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. In order to create maximum effect, local policies need to be comprehensive and widely implemented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"237 ","pages":"Pages 270-275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In absence of national legislation, local governments may stimulate outdoor sports clubs to become smoke-free. However, it is unknown whether and to what extent such efforts are effective in encouraging sports clubs to adopt a smoke-free policy (SFP). The aim of this study was to assess the association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs.

Study design

Retrospective, cross-sectional.

Methods

Information on Dutch sports clubs (N = 3068) was linked to information on tobacco control policies of municipalities (i.e., “smoking prevention policies”, “smoke-free environment policies”, and “smoke-free sports policies”) (N = 218). Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between municipal tobacco control policies and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs, while controlling for sports clubs’ characteristics.

Results

We found a positive, dose-response association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. The odds of having an SFP in place was significantly higher for sports clubs in municipalities with moderate “smoking prevention policies” (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.18–2.89), strong “smoke-free environment policies” (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.19–3.20), and strong “smoke-free sports policies” (OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.02–2.24) compared to sports clubs in municipalities with no/weak policies.

Conclusions

The results suggest that local tobacco control policies can increase the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. In order to create maximum effect, local policies need to be comprehensive and widely implemented.
地方控烟政策对无烟体育俱乐部普及率的影响
目标 在没有国家立法的情况下,地方政府可以鼓励户外运动俱乐部实行无烟政策。然而,这些努力是否以及在多大程度上能有效鼓励体育俱乐部采取无烟政策(SFP),目前尚不得而知。本研究旨在评估市政当局的控烟政策与户外运动俱乐部中无烟政策普及率之间的关联。研究设计回顾性横断面研究方法将荷兰体育俱乐部的信息(N = 3068)与市政当局的控烟政策信息(即 "预防吸烟政策"、"无烟环境政策 "和 "无烟运动政策")(N = 218)联系起来。多层次逻辑回归模型检验了市政控烟政策与户外运动俱乐部中SFP流行率之间的关系,同时控制了运动俱乐部的特征。结果我们发现,市政控烟政策与户外运动俱乐部中SFP流行率之间存在正相关的剂量反应关系。在中度 "预防吸烟政策"(OR = 1.85,95%CI = 1.18-2.89)、强力 "无烟环境政策"(OR = 1.95,95%CI = 1.19-3.20)和强力 "无烟环境政策"(OR = 1.85,95%CI = 1.18-2.89)的城市中,体育俱乐部实施 SFP 的几率明显更高。结论结果表明,地方控烟政策可以提高户外运动俱乐部的 SFP 患病率。为了产生最大效果,地方政策需要全面、广泛地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信