Human intent and cultural lineages: a response to Bentley & O'Brien

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.102
Anna Marie Prentiss
{"title":"Human intent and cultural lineages: a response to Bentley & O'Brien","authors":"Anna Marie Prentiss","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I thank Bentley and O'Brien (2024) for their cogent review of issues associated with inheritance and intention in cultural evolution. Intent is, of course, present in cultural process and that begs the question as to when and how we concern ourselves with it as a factor in cultural evolution (Rosenberg 2022). Intent underlies our understanding of both micro- and macro-scale processes of cultural evolution. Lamarckian microevolutionary process depends on decision-makers choosing whether or not to accept and sometimes alter cultural traits (Boyd &amp; Richerson 1985). Zeder (2009, 2018) points out that even long-term change may be affected by conscious infrastructural investments that alter capacity for socioeconomic production and, subsequently, canalise later developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I thank Bentley and O'Brien (2024) for their cogent review of issues associated with inheritance and intention in cultural evolution. Intent is, of course, present in cultural process and that begs the question as to when and how we concern ourselves with it as a factor in cultural evolution (Rosenberg 2022). Intent underlies our understanding of both micro- and macro-scale processes of cultural evolution. Lamarckian microevolutionary process depends on decision-makers choosing whether or not to accept and sometimes alter cultural traits (Boyd & Richerson 1985). Zeder (2009, 2018) points out that even long-term change may be affected by conscious infrastructural investments that alter capacity for socioeconomic production and, subsequently, canalise later developments.

人类意图和文化脉络:对本特利和奥布莱恩的回应
我感谢本特利和奥布莱恩(2024 年)对文化进化中与继承和意图相关的问题所做的有说服力的评述。意图当然存在于文化过程中,这就引出了一个问题:我们何时以及如何将其作为文化进化中的一个因素加以关注(罗森伯格,2022 年)。意图是我们理解微观和宏观文化进化过程的基础。拉马克的微观进化过程取决于决策者选择是否接受文化特征,有时甚至改变文化特征(Boyd & Richerson 1985)。Zeder(2009,2018)指出,即使是长期变化也可能受到有意识的基础设施投资的影响,这些投资改变了社会经济生产的能力,并随之影响了后来的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antiquity
Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
149
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信