The past was diverse and deeply creative: a response to Bentley & O'Brien

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.103
Catherine J. Frieman
{"title":"The past was diverse and deeply creative: a response to Bentley & O'Brien","authors":"Catherine J. Frieman","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I want to preface this response by noting that, while I think Bentley, O'Brien and I fundamentally differ in how we approach the archaeological record (2024), I am also convinced that the more perspectives on the past we can cultivate, the richer our interpretative garden will be. Moreover, the more narratives of past worlds we develop, the more nuanced and complex our image of the past will become and, hence, the messier and more human (Frieman in press). I therefore write in the hopes that we can disagree with care, so that all of our scholarship is enriched.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I want to preface this response by noting that, while I think Bentley, O'Brien and I fundamentally differ in how we approach the archaeological record (2024), I am also convinced that the more perspectives on the past we can cultivate, the richer our interpretative garden will be. Moreover, the more narratives of past worlds we develop, the more nuanced and complex our image of the past will become and, hence, the messier and more human (Frieman in press). I therefore write in the hopes that we can disagree with care, so that all of our scholarship is enriched.

过去多种多样,极富创造力:对本特利和奥布莱恩的回应
在回答这个问题之前,我想说的是,虽然我认为本特利、奥布莱恩和我在如何处理考古记录方面存在根本分歧(2024 年),但我也深信,我们对过去的视角越多,我们的解释花园就会越丰富。此外,我们对过去世界的叙述越多,我们对过去的印象就会变得越细微、越复杂,因而也就越混乱、越人性化(弗里曼,出版中)。因此,我写这篇文章是希望我们能够谨慎地提出不同意见,从而丰富我们的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antiquity
Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
149
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信