User characteristics and preferences for micromobility use in first- and last-mile journeys in Dublin, Ireland

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Giulia Oeschger , Brian Caulfield , Páraic Carroll
{"title":"User characteristics and preferences for micromobility use in first- and last-mile journeys in Dublin, Ireland","authors":"Giulia Oeschger ,&nbsp;Brian Caulfield ,&nbsp;Páraic Carroll","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Micromobility and public transport integration is an area of urban mobility that has been increasingly gaining attention and importance. The necessity to provide improvements to public transport services and their spatial reach in order to reduce the number and volume of car trips in cities is irrefutable. The integration of micromobility and public transport is often presented as a valuable strategy to improve door-to-door connectivity and coverage of existing public transport services, via provision of key first- and last-mile or access-egress connections. The aim of this study was to understand and model the propensity of commuters in County Dublin to use micromobility (private and shared) in the first- and last-miles of their public transport journeys. A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on these specific segments of the journey and a mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences based on socio-economic factors, mobility patterns and attitudes towards and previous experience of shared mobility. The results show that, in this particular case study, respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services for the first- and last-mile. A common assumption that walking is a last resort, and only chosen when there are no other options available was not confirmed by the findings of this study. Moreover, competition between the modes showed that private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, followed by private e-scooters, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking, and shared e-scooters less so than shared bicycles. Overall, the findings suggest that a small percentage of the sample – mainly young (&lt;35 years old) and male respondents with interest in and experience of e-scooters – were interested in using private and shared e-scooters for the first- and last-mile, but that the majority of the respondents were likely to choose walking, albeit with longer travel times overall.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100926"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Micromobility and public transport integration is an area of urban mobility that has been increasingly gaining attention and importance. The necessity to provide improvements to public transport services and their spatial reach in order to reduce the number and volume of car trips in cities is irrefutable. The integration of micromobility and public transport is often presented as a valuable strategy to improve door-to-door connectivity and coverage of existing public transport services, via provision of key first- and last-mile or access-egress connections. The aim of this study was to understand and model the propensity of commuters in County Dublin to use micromobility (private and shared) in the first- and last-miles of their public transport journeys. A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on these specific segments of the journey and a mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences based on socio-economic factors, mobility patterns and attitudes towards and previous experience of shared mobility. The results show that, in this particular case study, respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services for the first- and last-mile. A common assumption that walking is a last resort, and only chosen when there are no other options available was not confirmed by the findings of this study. Moreover, competition between the modes showed that private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, followed by private e-scooters, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking, and shared e-scooters less so than shared bicycles. Overall, the findings suggest that a small percentage of the sample – mainly young (<35 years old) and male respondents with interest in and experience of e-scooters – were interested in using private and shared e-scooters for the first- and last-mile, but that the majority of the respondents were likely to choose walking, albeit with longer travel times overall.
在爱尔兰都柏林的 "最初一英里 "和 "最后一英里 "行程中使用微型交通的用户特征和偏好
微型交通和公共交通一体化是城市交通的一个领域,日益受到关注和重视。为了减少城市中汽车出行的次数和数量,改善公共交通服务及其空间覆盖范围的必要性是无可辩驳的。微型交通与公共交通的结合通常被视为一种有价值的战略,通过提供关键的 "最初一英里 "和 "最后一英里 "或 "入口-出口 "连接,改善现有公共交通服务的 "门到门 "连接和覆盖范围。本研究旨在了解都柏林郡的通勤者在公共交通出行的前一英里和最后一英里使用微型交通工具(私人和共享)的倾向,并建立相关模型。研究针对这些特定的行程段进行了陈述偏好实验,并根据社会经济因素、交通模式、对共享交通的态度和以往经验估算了混合对数模型,以确定用户的特征和偏好。结果显示,在这一特定案例研究中,对步行有强烈偏好的受访者不太可能对私人微型交通和共享服务的 "最初一英里 "和 "最后一英里 "感兴趣。人们普遍认为步行是最后的选择,只有在没有其他选择时才会选择步行,但本研究的结果并没有证实这一点。此外,各种出行方式之间的竞争表明,私人自行车是仅次于步行的首选出行方式,其次是私人电动滑板车,而共享出行方式比步行更少被选择,共享电动滑板车比共享自行车更少被选择。总体而言,研究结果表明,小部分样本--主要是对电动滑板车感兴趣并有使用经验的年轻人(35 岁)和男性受访者--有兴趣使用私人和共享电动滑板车来完成 "最初一英里 "和 "最后一英里 "的出行,但大多数受访者可能会选择步行,尽管总体出行时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信