Patients’ Health Literacy for Radiological Procedures and Examinations

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dr Andrea Doubleday, Ms Francine Mula, Dr Tracey Pieterse
{"title":"Patients’ Health Literacy for Radiological Procedures and Examinations","authors":"Dr Andrea Doubleday,&nbsp;Ms Francine Mula,&nbsp;Dr Tracey Pieterse","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health literacy is crucial in healthcare as it influences an individual's ability to make well-informed health decisions, resulting in better health management and outcomes. Limited health literacy has been linked to poor health outcomes, such as increased mortality risk, morbidity, and complications. This presentation will provide an overview of an integrative review that investigated patients’ knowledge and understanding of a scheduled radiological procedure and the barriers that inhibit good health literacy in radiology patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted using the electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL. The keywords used were “health literacy”, “patient knowledge”, “before”, “radiolog*”, and “exam*”. The review included literature that investigated patient knowledge regarding radiological examinations such as general radiography, computed tomography, mammography, and interventional or fluoroscopy, written in English and published between January 2013 and May 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,728 studies were initially identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Fifty-one of which met the criteria for this review and were eligible. Four key themes regarding patient knowledge before their appointment were distinguished: 1) Patient preparation awareness; 2) General knowledge and information received; 3) Radiation exposure estimation; 4) Risk perception.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a significant gap in patients' knowledge about their scheduled radiological appointments in general. Certain barriers exist which hinder patients from effectively acquiring satisfactory knowledge. This included their passive approach to health decisions and low education level. Patients heavily rely on healthcare professionals, especially their referring physician, to provide them with the necessary information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424002315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health literacy is crucial in healthcare as it influences an individual's ability to make well-informed health decisions, resulting in better health management and outcomes. Limited health literacy has been linked to poor health outcomes, such as increased mortality risk, morbidity, and complications. This presentation will provide an overview of an integrative review that investigated patients’ knowledge and understanding of a scheduled radiological procedure and the barriers that inhibit good health literacy in radiology patients.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using the electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL. The keywords used were “health literacy”, “patient knowledge”, “before”, “radiolog*”, and “exam*”. The review included literature that investigated patient knowledge regarding radiological examinations such as general radiography, computed tomography, mammography, and interventional or fluoroscopy, written in English and published between January 2013 and May 2023.

Results

A total of 1,728 studies were initially identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Fifty-one of which met the criteria for this review and were eligible. Four key themes regarding patient knowledge before their appointment were distinguished: 1) Patient preparation awareness; 2) General knowledge and information received; 3) Radiation exposure estimation; 4) Risk perception.

Conclusions

There is a significant gap in patients' knowledge about their scheduled radiological appointments in general. Certain barriers exist which hinder patients from effectively acquiring satisfactory knowledge. This included their passive approach to health decisions and low education level. Patients heavily rely on healthcare professionals, especially their referring physician, to provide them with the necessary information.
患者对放射程序和检查的健康知识了解情况
背景健康素养对医疗保健至关重要,因为它影响着个人在充分知情的情况下做出健康决定的能力,从而带来更好的健康管理和结果。有限的健康素养与不良的健康结果有关,如增加死亡风险、发病率和并发症。本讲座将概述一项综合综述,该综述调查了患者对放射科预定程序的了解和理解,以及阻碍放射科患者良好健康素养的障碍:方法使用以下电子数据库进行了系统检索:Medline、EMBASE 和 CINAHL。使用的关键词包括 "健康素养"、"患者知识"、"检查前"、"放射科*"和 "检查*"。综述收录了2013年1月至2023年5月期间发表的、用英语撰写的、调查患者对放射检查(如普通放射摄影、计算机断层扫描、乳腺放射摄影、介入或透视检查)相关知识的文献。其中有 51 项符合本综述的标准,符合条件。有关患者预约前的知识有四个关键主题:1) 患者准备意识;2) 一般知识和所获信息;3) 辐射照射估计;4) 风险认知。某些障碍阻碍了患者有效获得满意的知识。这包括他们在做出健康决定时的被动态度和较低的教育水平。患者在很大程度上依赖于医护人员,尤其是他们的转诊医生,为他们提供必要的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信