Venopunción en Urgencias Pediátricas mediante método de Distracción con Apego Koala: ensayo clínico aleatorizado

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Iria Quintela-Sánchez, Nieves Gasca-Roche, Tania Fernández-Merino, Laura Larena-Fernández, María López-Cabrejas, Josep Oriol Casanovas-Marsal
{"title":"Venopunción en Urgencias Pediátricas mediante método de Distracción con Apego Koala: ensayo clínico aleatorizado","authors":"Iria Quintela-Sánchez,&nbsp;Nieves Gasca-Roche,&nbsp;Tania Fernández-Merino,&nbsp;Laura Larena-Fernández,&nbsp;María López-Cabrejas,&nbsp;Josep Oriol Casanovas-Marsal","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess, compare and relate the toddler's pain and anxiety during venipuncture by using either the Koala Attachment Distraction method or the physical restraint method and to evaluate the level of anxiety perceived by the companions in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial in two arms (control and intervention group) conducted in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary university hospital. The study variables were pain and stress of the child and anxiety perceived by the accompanying persons in both groups at the time before and during the technique. The pain rating scale Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability; the Groningen stress scale and the STAI questionnaire were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 113 participants aged 3 to 4 years participated in the trial (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->113). 50% (55) were girls, mean total age 3.83<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.59 years and accompanying persons 37.17<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.96. During the technique the mean pain in control and intervention groups was 5.64<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.30 and 3.87<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.01; stress, 3.25<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.22 and 2.67<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.24, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the assessment of anxiety between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who underwent the Koala Attachment Distraction method venipuncture show a lower level of pain and anxiety than those who received physical restraint, and the anxiety perceived by the companion is similar in both groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862124000937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess, compare and relate the toddler's pain and anxiety during venipuncture by using either the Koala Attachment Distraction method or the physical restraint method and to evaluate the level of anxiety perceived by the companions in both groups.

Method

Randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial in two arms (control and intervention group) conducted in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary university hospital. The study variables were pain and stress of the child and anxiety perceived by the accompanying persons in both groups at the time before and during the technique. The pain rating scale Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability; the Groningen stress scale and the STAI questionnaire were used.

Results

A total of 113 participants aged 3 to 4 years participated in the trial (n = 113). 50% (55) were girls, mean total age 3.83 ± 0.59 years and accompanying persons 37.17 ± 6.96. During the technique the mean pain in control and intervention groups was 5.64 ± 3.30 and 3.87 ± 3.01; stress, 3.25 ± 1.22 and 2.67 ± 1.24, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the assessment of anxiety between the groups.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent the Koala Attachment Distraction method venipuncture show a lower level of pain and anxiety than those who received physical restraint, and the anxiety perceived by the companion is similar in both groups.
在儿科急诊中使用考拉牵引附着法进行静脉穿刺:随机临床试验
目的评估、比较和联系使用考拉依恋分散法或物理约束法进行静脉穿刺时幼儿的疼痛和焦虑,并评估两组陪护人员感知到的焦虑程度。方法在一所三级大学医院的儿科急诊室进行随机、单盲、对照临床试验,分为两组(对照组和干预组)。研究变量为两组陪护人员在技术实施前和实施过程中感受到的患儿疼痛、压力和焦虑。研究使用了疼痛评分量表 "脸、腿、活动、哭泣、安慰"、格罗宁根压力量表和 STAI 问卷。女孩占 50%(55 人),平均年龄(3.83 ± 0.59)岁,陪同人员(37.17 ± 6.96)人。在技术过程中,对照组和干预组的平均疼痛分别为 5.64 ± 3.30 和 3.87 ± 3.01;压力分别为 3.25 ± 1.22 和 2.67 ± 1.24。结论与接受物理约束的患者相比,接受考拉依恋牵引法静脉穿刺的患者疼痛和焦虑程度较低,两组患者的陪护所感受到的焦虑程度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信