Global Reparations within Capitalism: Aspirations and Tensions in Contemporary Movements for Reparatory Justice

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ndongo Samba Sylla, Andrew M. Fischer, Annina Kaltenbrunner, Sreerekha Sathi
{"title":"Global Reparations within Capitalism: Aspirations and Tensions in Contemporary Movements for Reparatory Justice","authors":"Ndongo Samba Sylla,&nbsp;Andrew M. Fischer,&nbsp;Annina Kaltenbrunner,&nbsp;Sreerekha Sathi","doi":"10.1111/dech.12855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The idea of global reparations has received increasing attention in recent years, not only with respect to legacies of slavery and colonialism, but also to interrelated issues such as climate change, debt crisis, or ongoing financial transfers from the Global South to the Global North. This article, which introduces and sets the Debate for the 2024 Forum issue on the political economy of 21st century global reparations, offers a critical perspective on contemporary global reparations agendas, including their macroeconomic and development implications for the Global South. It highlights the contentious, unresolved questions about how reparations movements should interact with the highly unequal structures of global capitalism. To what degree should they seek large redistributive gains within these structures, or else aim for more revolutionary standpoints which reject these structures? If the former, would this compromise any hope for reparations to be truly transformative and able to address the challenges presented by global white supremacy? The hope of reparations movements is to make progressive gains that could become the catalyst for more transformative changes on a global scale. At the same time, sympathetic critics question whether reparations are feasible or should be a primary focus of advocacy for achieving racial and climate justice on national as well as global levels. In outlining these points of debate, the article also considers the questions of how to make global reparations work for recipients, and how to finance them. It concludes by elaborating on the challenge of moving towards a more developmentalist emphasis of ‘systemic reparations’.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"55 4","pages":"560-600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.12855","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea of global reparations has received increasing attention in recent years, not only with respect to legacies of slavery and colonialism, but also to interrelated issues such as climate change, debt crisis, or ongoing financial transfers from the Global South to the Global North. This article, which introduces and sets the Debate for the 2024 Forum issue on the political economy of 21st century global reparations, offers a critical perspective on contemporary global reparations agendas, including their macroeconomic and development implications for the Global South. It highlights the contentious, unresolved questions about how reparations movements should interact with the highly unequal structures of global capitalism. To what degree should they seek large redistributive gains within these structures, or else aim for more revolutionary standpoints which reject these structures? If the former, would this compromise any hope for reparations to be truly transformative and able to address the challenges presented by global white supremacy? The hope of reparations movements is to make progressive gains that could become the catalyst for more transformative changes on a global scale. At the same time, sympathetic critics question whether reparations are feasible or should be a primary focus of advocacy for achieving racial and climate justice on national as well as global levels. In outlining these points of debate, the article also considers the questions of how to make global reparations work for recipients, and how to finance them. It concludes by elaborating on the challenge of moving towards a more developmentalist emphasis of ‘systemic reparations’.

资本主义中的全球赔偿:当代争取赔偿正义运动中的愿望和紧张关系
近年来,全球赔偿的理念受到越来越多的关注,不仅涉及奴隶制和殖民主义的遗留问题,还涉及气候变化、债务危机或全球南部向全球北部的持续资金转移等相互关联的问题。本文介绍了 2024 年论坛议题 "21 世纪全球赔偿的政治经济学",并为该议题设置了辩论环节,对当代全球赔偿议程,包括其对全球南部的宏观经济和发展影响提出了批判性的观点。它强调了赔偿运动应如何与高度不平等的全球资本主义结构互动的争议性和悬而未决的问题。他们应该在多大程度上在这些结构中寻求大量的再分配收益,还是以摒弃这些结构的更具革命性的立场为目标?如果是前者,这是否会损害使赔偿真正具有变革性并能够应对全球白人至上主义所带来挑战的任何希望?赔偿运动的希望在于取得进步成果,从而推动全球范围内更具变革性的变化。与此同时,持同情态度的批评者质疑赔偿是否可行,或者是否应该成为在国家和全球层面实现种族和气候正义的主要宣传重点。在概述这些争论点时,文章还考虑了如何使全球赔偿对受惠者有效以及如何为其提供资金等问题。最后,文章阐述了向更加注重发展的 "系统性赔偿 "转变所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信