Iso-lating optimal automated external defibrillator signage: An international survey

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Brandon Stretton , Gregory Page , Joshua Kovoor , Ammar Zaka , Aashray Gupta , Stephen Bacchi , Anjalee Amarasekera , Anoja Gunaratne , Aravinda Thiagalingam , Gopal Sivagangabalan , Pramesh Kovoor
{"title":"Iso-lating optimal automated external defibrillator signage: An international survey","authors":"Brandon Stretton ,&nbsp;Gregory Page ,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor ,&nbsp;Ammar Zaka ,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Anjalee Amarasekera ,&nbsp;Anoja Gunaratne ,&nbsp;Aravinda Thiagalingam ,&nbsp;Gopal Sivagangabalan ,&nbsp;Pramesh Kovoor","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study investigated the public’s preference to a recognisable and meaningful signage for Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in alignment with ISO 7010 standards, aiming to identify improvements for better public awareness and response during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A survey was administered via SurveyMonkey® and Heart of the Nation’s social media. The survey evaluated recognition of ISO signage colors and AED symbols, and preferences for alternative AED signs. Baseline data including geographic location, industry employment, and first aid training were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 935 responses were received (Heart of the Nation’s social media (n = 244) Survey Monkey’s (paid, and independent of Heart of the Nation, n = 691). There were 511 from the US and Canada (54.65 %), 222 from the UK and Europe (23.76 %), 133 from the Asia Pacific (14.22 %), 6 from South America (0.64 %), 2 from the Middle East (0.21 %), and 61 from other territories (6.53 %). Among participants, 455 (48.66 %) were first aid trained. The healthcare sector was the most common employment (n = 155, 16.58 %). Only 187 (20 %) participants correctly identified the ISO AED sign. The preferred sign was a yellow sign with a red heart and blue font, chosen by 252 (27 %) participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Current ISO 7010 AED signage is not widely recognised, and is only correctly interpreted by a small percentage of the public. The study suggests a need for more intuitive and visually distinct signage, such as the preferred yellow sign, to improve visibility and understanding, thereby enhancing AED accessibility and usage in OHCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study investigated the public’s preference to a recognisable and meaningful signage for Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in alignment with ISO 7010 standards, aiming to identify improvements for better public awareness and response during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA).

Methods

A survey was administered via SurveyMonkey® and Heart of the Nation’s social media. The survey evaluated recognition of ISO signage colors and AED symbols, and preferences for alternative AED signs. Baseline data including geographic location, industry employment, and first aid training were collected.

Results

A total of 935 responses were received (Heart of the Nation’s social media (n = 244) Survey Monkey’s (paid, and independent of Heart of the Nation, n = 691). There were 511 from the US and Canada (54.65 %), 222 from the UK and Europe (23.76 %), 133 from the Asia Pacific (14.22 %), 6 from South America (0.64 %), 2 from the Middle East (0.21 %), and 61 from other territories (6.53 %). Among participants, 455 (48.66 %) were first aid trained. The healthcare sector was the most common employment (n = 155, 16.58 %). Only 187 (20 %) participants correctly identified the ISO AED sign. The preferred sign was a yellow sign with a red heart and blue font, chosen by 252 (27 %) participants.

Conclusion

Current ISO 7010 AED signage is not widely recognised, and is only correctly interpreted by a small percentage of the public. The study suggests a need for more intuitive and visually distinct signage, such as the preferred yellow sign, to improve visibility and understanding, thereby enhancing AED accessibility and usage in OHCA.
等效确定最佳自动体外除颤器标识:一项国际调查。
导言:本研究调查了公众对符合 ISO 7010 标准的可识别且有意义的自动体外除颤器 (AED) 标识的偏好,旨在确定改进措施,以提高公众对院外心脏骤停 (OHCA) 的认识和响应:方法:通过 SurveyMonkey® 和 "全国之心 "的社交媒体进行调查。调查评估了对 ISO 标志颜色和自动体外除颤器符号的识别情况,以及对替代性自动体外除颤器标志的偏好。此外,还收集了包括地理位置、行业就业和急救培训在内的基线数据:共收到 935 份回复(国家心脏中心的社交媒体(n = 244)、Survey Monkey(付费,独立于国家心脏中心,n = 691))。其中 511 人来自美国和加拿大(54.65%),222 人来自英国和欧洲(23.76%),133 人来自亚太地区(14.22%),6 人来自南美(0.64%),2 人来自中东(0.21%),61 人来自其他地区(6.53%)。参与者中有 455 人(48.66 %)接受过急救培训。医疗保健行业是最常见的职业(n = 155,16.58 %)。只有 187 人(20%)正确识别了 ISO 自动体外除颤器标志。有 252 名参与者(27%)选择了红心和蓝色字体的黄色标志:结论:目前的 ISO 7010 自动体外除颤器标志并未得到广泛认可,只有一小部分公众能够正确理解。这项研究表明,有必要使用更直观、视觉效果更明显的标识,例如首选的黄色标识,以提高可视性和理解度,从而提高自动体外除颤器的可及性和在心梗患者中的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信