[Gender-Specific and Cross-Gender Reasons for Choosing 'Surgeon' as a Career - A Scoping Review].

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2390-2343

Johanna Hirsch, Vanessa Bäcker, Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns

{"title":"[Gender-Specific and Cross-Gender Reasons for Choosing 'Surgeon' as a Career - A Scoping Review].","authors":"Johanna Hirsch, Vanessa Bäcker, Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns","doi":"10.1055/a-2390-2343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The availability of highly qualified surgical staff in Germany has been a challenge for years. Despite various initiatives to increase the attractiveness of surgical training programs, there are still problems in attracting motivated and qualified doctors to surgery. In order to develop customized offers for recruiting junior staff, the decision-making factors must be known.Objective: To present the gender-specific and cross-gender reasons for choosing a surgical specialist training program.Method: As part of a scoping review, studies were identified using PubMed and a subsequent reverse search to answer the research question. Data extracted from the studies were summarized narratively and categories were defined.Results: The analysis of 12 studies revealed that men and women wanted to become a surgeon based on the characteristics of the surgical specialty, personal factors and factors related to the training position. Gender-specific differences were also identified.Conclusion: Specific measures are proposed to promote the next generation of surgeons.","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2390-2343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The availability of highly qualified surgical staff in Germany has been a challenge for years. Despite various initiatives to increase the attractiveness of surgical training programs, there are still problems in attracting motivated and qualified doctors to surgery. In order to develop customized offers for recruiting junior staff, the decision-making factors must be known.

Objective: To present the gender-specific and cross-gender reasons for choosing a surgical specialist training program.

Method: As part of a scoping review, studies were identified using PubMed and a subsequent reverse search to answer the research question. Data extracted from the studies were summarized narratively and categories were defined.

Results: The analysis of 12 studies revealed that men and women wanted to become a surgeon based on the characteristics of the surgical specialty, personal factors and factors related to the training position. Gender-specific differences were also identified.

Conclusion: Specific measures are proposed to promote the next generation of surgeons.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[选择 "外科医生 "作为职业的性别特异性和跨性别原因--范围研究]。

导言：多年来，德国一直面临着缺乏高素质外科人才的挑战。尽管采取了各种措施来提高外科培训项目的吸引力，但在吸引有积极性的合格医生从事外科工作方面仍然存在问题。为了制定量身定制的初级人员招聘方案，必须了解决策因素：介绍选择外科专科培训项目的特定性别和跨性别原因：作为范围综述的一部分，使用 PubMed 和随后的反向搜索确定了相关研究，以回答研究问题。对从研究中提取的数据进行了叙述性总结，并确定了类别：对 12 项研究的分析表明，男性和女性都希望成为外科医生，这取决于外科专业的特点、个人因素以及与培训职位相关的因素。此外，还发现了性别差异：结论：建议采取具体措施促进下一代外科医生的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

18.20%

发文量

308

期刊介绍： The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.