Comparison of intra and postoperative analgesia efficacy of intraperitoneal levobupivacaine alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy; a randomized, prospective, blinded, clinical trial
{"title":"Comparison of intra and postoperative analgesia efficacy of intraperitoneal levobupivacaine alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy; a randomized, prospective, blinded, clinical trial","authors":"Damla Tuğçe Okur , Alper Yasin Çiplak , Şifanur Aydin , Sıtkıcan Okur , Ayşe Gölgeli Bedir , Ömer Tarık Orhun , Şaab Elban , Vefa Tohumcu","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to compare the analgesic and cardiopulmonary effects of levobupivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine, in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. In this prospective, randomized, and blinded clinical trial, 24 healthy cats were recruited. Animals received either saline (S group; 2 mL NaCl), levobupivacaine alone (Lev; 0.35 mg/kg), or levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine (LevDex group; 0.004 mg/kg), which was infiltrated intraoperatively into the subcutaneous tissue at various incision sites, including the right and left ovarian pedicles and the caudal aspect of the uterine body. Intraoperative analgesia was evaluated using a cumulative pain scale, while postoperative analgesia was assessed at various time points: before surgery (T<sub>b</sub>), and at 0 (T<sub>0</sub>), 1 (T<sub>1h</sub>), 2 (T<sub>2h</sub>), 4 (T<sub>4h</sub>), 8 (T<sub>8h</sub>), 12 (T<sub>12h</sub>), and 24 (T<sub>24h</sub>) hours after the procedure, using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS). Significant decreases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure were observed in LevDex group as compared to S and Lev groups (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The S group required significantly more rescue morphine doses than the LevDex group (<em>p</em> = 0.029), but the difference was not significant when compared to the Lev group (<em>p</em> = 0.123). At T<sub>1h</sub> and T<sub>2h</sub>, the S group had significantly higher MCPS scores than both the Lev and LevDex groups (<em>p</em> = 0.029). However, at T<sub>8h</sub>, no significant difference was found between the S and LevDex groups (<em>p</em> = 0.741). While adding dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine may slightly prolong postoperative analgesia, this combination does not provide significant additional benefit over levobupivacaine alone in terms of response to surgical stimulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824003096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the analgesic and cardiopulmonary effects of levobupivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine, in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. In this prospective, randomized, and blinded clinical trial, 24 healthy cats were recruited. Animals received either saline (S group; 2 mL NaCl), levobupivacaine alone (Lev; 0.35 mg/kg), or levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine (LevDex group; 0.004 mg/kg), which was infiltrated intraoperatively into the subcutaneous tissue at various incision sites, including the right and left ovarian pedicles and the caudal aspect of the uterine body. Intraoperative analgesia was evaluated using a cumulative pain scale, while postoperative analgesia was assessed at various time points: before surgery (Tb), and at 0 (T0), 1 (T1h), 2 (T2h), 4 (T4h), 8 (T8h), 12 (T12h), and 24 (T24h) hours after the procedure, using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS). Significant decreases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure were observed in LevDex group as compared to S and Lev groups (p < 0.05). The S group required significantly more rescue morphine doses than the LevDex group (p = 0.029), but the difference was not significant when compared to the Lev group (p = 0.123). At T1h and T2h, the S group had significantly higher MCPS scores than both the Lev and LevDex groups (p = 0.029). However, at T8h, no significant difference was found between the S and LevDex groups (p = 0.741). While adding dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine may slightly prolong postoperative analgesia, this combination does not provide significant additional benefit over levobupivacaine alone in terms of response to surgical stimulation.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.