The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel
{"title":"The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.","authors":"Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.

Materials and methods: Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.

Results: PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).

Conclusions: Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.

PSMA PET/CT 对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术临床决策的影响。
目的评估前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)在欧洲一家高容量癌症中心的日常临床实践中使用后,对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)临床决策的影响:回顾性纳入2017年至2021年期间患有中高危前列腺癌的患者,并将其分为两组:使用PSMA PET/CT分期的患者(第1组)和使用传统方式分期的患者(第2组)。RP优于非手术治疗和PLND的临床决策是主要终点,并使用回归模型进行评估:与传统成像模式相比,PSMA PET/CT 发现的 N1 病变明显增多(24.2% 对 11.3%;P = 0.01;OR,1.97;95% CI,1.18-3.28),但 M1 病变显著增多(9.9% 对 5.7%;P = 0.42;OR,1.91;95% CI,0.39-9.23):与放射成像相比,分子成像(PSMA PET/CT)未怀疑淋巴结侵犯的患者更倾向于转诊至RP。此外,PLND 的决定主要受分期结果的影响。与传统成像相比,PSMA PET/CT 的结果在 PLND 决策中更为可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信