Social networks and gender inequitable attitudes among men and women in rural Nepal.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2024.2420706
Shweta Tomar, Cari Jo Clark, Abbie Shervinskie, Gemma Ferguson, Holly Baker Shakya
{"title":"Social networks and gender inequitable attitudes among men and women in rural Nepal.","authors":"Shweta Tomar, Cari Jo Clark, Abbie Shervinskie, Gemma Ferguson, Holly Baker Shakya","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2024.2420706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender-inequitable attitudes are known factors associated with women's experience of intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study aims to identify social network factors associated with gender-inequitable attitudes among men and women in Nepal. Data came from the baseline assessment for evaluating Change Starts at Home- an IPV prevention intervention in rural Nepal (<i>N</i> = 1994). Linear regression models adjusted for participant demographics provided the associations between participants' gender-inequitable attitude scores (GIAS) and their social network characteristics. Results show that women who nominated their parents (beta = -1.29) or neighbours (beta = -1.18) had better GIAS while those nominating their brother-in-law/sister-in-law (beta = 0.36) had worse GIAS. Men with higher degree (beta = -0.27) and those who nominated their spouse (beta = -0.75) had better GIAS. Women's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' when the alter was within their household, had a closer relationship, or the alter was male. Men's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' attitudes when the alter was not from the same household or if they had a weak tie. Findings indicate that IPV prevention programmes must consider men's and women's network characteristics separately. For example, interventions for women should focus on relationships within their households, while interventions for men should focus on relationships outside their households.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"2420706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2420706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender-inequitable attitudes are known factors associated with women's experience of intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study aims to identify social network factors associated with gender-inequitable attitudes among men and women in Nepal. Data came from the baseline assessment for evaluating Change Starts at Home- an IPV prevention intervention in rural Nepal (N = 1994). Linear regression models adjusted for participant demographics provided the associations between participants' gender-inequitable attitude scores (GIAS) and their social network characteristics. Results show that women who nominated their parents (beta = -1.29) or neighbours (beta = -1.18) had better GIAS while those nominating their brother-in-law/sister-in-law (beta = 0.36) had worse GIAS. Men with higher degree (beta = -0.27) and those who nominated their spouse (beta = -0.75) had better GIAS. Women's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' when the alter was within their household, had a closer relationship, or the alter was male. Men's GIAS was strongly associated with their alters' attitudes when the alter was not from the same household or if they had a weak tie. Findings indicate that IPV prevention programmes must consider men's and women's network characteristics separately. For example, interventions for women should focus on relationships within their households, while interventions for men should focus on relationships outside their households.

尼泊尔农村地区男女的社会网络和性别不平等态度。
众所周知,性别不平等态度是与女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)相关的因素。本研究旨在确定与尼泊尔男性和女性的性别不平等态度相关的社会网络因素。数据来源于对尼泊尔农村地区一项名为 "改变从家庭开始 "的 IPV 预防干预措施的基线评估(N = 1994)。线性回归模型对参与者的人口统计学特征进行了调整,得出了参与者的性别不公平态度得分(GIAS)与其社会网络特征之间的关联。结果显示,提名父母(β=-1.29)或邻居(β=-1.18)的女性 GIAS 更好,而提名姐夫/嫂子(β=0.36)的女性 GIAS 更差。学历较高的男性(beta = -0.27)和提名配偶的男性(beta = -0.75)的 GIAS 更高。女性的 GIAS 与她们的改变者密切相关,如果改变者是她们的家人、关系更亲密或改变者是男性。男性的 GIAS 与改变者的态度密切相关,如果改变者不是来自同一个家庭,或者他们之间的关系较弱。研究结果表明,IPV 预防计划必须分别考虑男性和女性的网络特征。例如,针对女性的干预措施应侧重于其家庭内部的关系,而针对男性的干预措施则应侧重于其家庭外部的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信